Gitlint vs pre-commit

Overview

pre-commit

Stacks1.4K

Followers43

Votes0

GitHub Stars802

Forks95

Gitlint

Stacks10

Followers11

Votes0

GitHub Stars920

Forks111

Gitlint vs pre-commit: What are the differences?

Gitlint vs pre-commit: Key Differences

Inclusion of Git Hook Management: Gitlint is a tool that specifically deals with enforcing commit message standards, whereas pre-commit is a more comprehensive tool that allows you to manage multiple Git hooks, including commit message standards.
Rule Set Customization: Gitlint provides a predefined set of rules for enforcing commit message standards, and it allows you to customize them to some extent. On the other hand, pre-commit offers a broader range of customizable hooks, including commit message checks, and allows you to define your own rules and hooks in any programming language.
Configuration Flexibility: Gitlint's configuration file is typically placed in the repository's root directory, making it easy to configure on a per-repository basis. Pre-commit, however, requires a configuration file placed in the repository's .pre-commit-config.yaml file, which may be less intuitive for some users.
Ease of Installation: Gitlint is available as a standalone package that can be installed with a single command using popular package managers. In contrast, pre-commit requires installation and configuration of a separate executable and additional dependencies in order to function properly.
Integration with Continuous Integration (CI): Pre-commit provides seamless integration with CI systems, allowing you to run hooks during the build process. Gitlint, while not inherently lacking in CI integration, is primarily focused on enforcing commit message standards and does not provide built-in CI integration features.
Extensibility: Gitlint is a specialized tool dedicated solely to enforcing commit message standards, limiting its extensibility to this specific use case. In contrast, pre-commit is a more versatile framework that supports a wide range of hooks, providing greater extensibility to suit various workflow needs.

In summary, Gitlint and pre-commit differ in their scope, rule customization, configuration flexibility, installation process, CI integration, and extensibility. Gitlint mainly focuses on enforcing commit message standards, while pre-commit offers a more comprehensive set of Git hooks management capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

pre-commit	Gitlint
pre-commit checks your code for errors before you commit it. pre-commit is configurable.	Git commit message linter written in python (for Linux and Mac, experimental on Windows), checks your commit messages for style.
debugger: make sure you don't commit a debugger statement;tabs: make sure your code uses leading spaces instead of tabs;whitespace: make sure you don't commit trailing whitespace;jslint: syntax check your javascript before you commit it;ci: run a quick test suite before you commit	Auto-trigger validations against new commit message right when you're committing. Also works with pre-commit; Designed to work with your own scripts or CI system; Easily configurable; Community contributed rules; User-defined rules; Full unicode support;Production-ready
Statistics
GitHub Stars 802	GitHub Stars 920
GitHub Forks 95	GitHub Forks 111
Stacks 1.4K	Stacks 10
Followers 43	Followers 11
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Git Linux macOS Windows

What are some alternatives to pre-commit, Gitlint?

Diff So Fancy

diff-so-fancy builds on the good-lookin' output of git contrib's diff-highlight to upgrade your diffs' appearances.

TortoiseGit

It is a Git revision control client, implemented as a Windows shell extension and based on TortoiseSVN. It is free software released under the GNU General Public License.

GitUI

It is a blazing fast terminal-UI for git written in Rust. You can inspect, commit, and amend changes. It has context-based help (no need to memorize tons of hot-keys).

pre-commit by Yelp

If one of your developers doesn’t have node installed but modifies a JavaScript file, pre-commit automatically handles downloading and building node to run jshint without root. Pre-commit is a multi-language package manager for pre-commit hooks. You specify a list of hooks you want and pre-commit manages the installation and execution of any hook written in any language before every commit. pre-commit is specifically designed to not require root access.

ungit

Clean and intuitive UI that makes it easy to understand git.

rebase-editor

Simple terminal based sequence editor for git interactive rebase. Written in Node.js, published to npm, uses terminal-kit.

hub

hub is a command line tool that wraps git in order to extend it with extra features and commands that make working with GitHub easier.

Check It Out

Check It Out lets you interactively see and choose what branch you want to check out without the hassle of trying to type out a long or confusing branch name. Checking out branches just got even simpler!

hug-scm

A humane, intuitive interface for Git and other version control systems. Hug transforms complex and forgettable Git commands into a simple, predictable language that feels natural to use, keeping you focused on your code, not on wrestling with version control.

Git-Repo

Control your remote git hosting services from the git commandline. The usage is very simple.

Related Comparisons

Gitlint vs pre-commit: What are the differences?

Gitlint vs pre-commit: Key Differences

Inclusion of Git Hook Management: Gitlint is a tool that specifically deals with enforcing commit message standards, whereas pre-commit is a more comprehensive tool that allows you to manage multiple Git hooks, including commit message standards.
Rule Set Customization: Gitlint provides a predefined set of rules for enforcing commit message standards, and it allows you to customize them to some extent. On the other hand, pre-commit offers a broader range of customizable hooks, including commit message checks, and allows you to define your own rules and hooks in any programming language.
Configuration Flexibility: Gitlint's configuration file is typically placed in the repository's root directory, making it easy to configure on a per-repository basis. Pre-commit, however, requires a configuration file placed in the repository's .pre-commit-config.yaml file, which may be less intuitive for some users.
Ease of Installation: Gitlint is available as a standalone package that can be installed with a single command using popular package managers. In contrast, pre-commit requires installation and configuration of a separate executable and additional dependencies in order to function properly.
Integration with Continuous Integration (CI): Pre-commit provides seamless integration with CI systems, allowing you to run hooks during the build process. Gitlint, while not inherently lacking in CI integration, is primarily focused on enforcing commit message standards and does not provide built-in CI integration features.
Extensibility: Gitlint is a specialized tool dedicated solely to enforcing commit message standards, limiting its extensibility to this specific use case. In contrast, pre-commit is a more versatile framework that supports a wide range of hooks, providing greater extensibility to suit various workflow needs.

Gitlint vs pre-commit

Overview

Gitlint vs pre-commit: What are the differences?