StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitLab vs RhodeCode

GitLab vs RhodeCode

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
RhodeCode
RhodeCode
Stacks33
Followers42
Votes210

GitLab vs RhodeCode: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitLab and RhodeCode are both web-based open-source software for version control and collaboration. While they share similarities, there are key differences between the two platforms.

  1. User Interface: GitLab offers a sleek and modern user interface that is easy to navigate. It provides a clean and intuitive user experience, making it easier for users to find and access the features they need. On the other hand, RhodeCode has a more traditional and slightly dated user interface, which may require some learning curve for new users.

  2. Enterprise Features: GitLab provides robust enterprise-grade features, including built-in CI/CD, project management tools, and extensive permission management. It offers a complete DevOps platform with features like Kubernetes integration, high availability, and serverless CI/CD. In contrast, RhodeCode focuses more on the version control aspect and may not offer the same level of enterprise features as GitLab.

  3. Built-in Code Review: GitLab has a built-in code review system that allows users to easily leave comments and suggestions on code changes. This feature streamlines the code review process and encourages collaboration among team members. RhodeCode, on the other hand, may require the integration of external code review tools and does not provide a native code review system.

  4. Community and Support: GitLab has a larger community and a strong support system in place. It has an active user base and a dedicated team that regularly releases updates and provides support through documentation, forums, and support tickets. RhodeCode, while still having a community and support system, may not be as extensive or well-established as GitLab's.

  5. Pricing and Licensing: GitLab offers both a free community edition and a paid enterprise edition with additional features and support. The pricing structure is transparent and based on the number of users. RhodeCode also has a free community edition but has a more complex pricing structure with different editions and additional costs for certain features and integrations.

In summary, GitLab offers a modern user interface, extensive enterprise features, built-in code review, strong community support, and transparent pricing. RhodeCode may have a slightly dated interface, focus more on version control, require external code review tools, have a smaller community and support system, and a more complex pricing structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, RhodeCode

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Phillip
Phillip

Developer at Coach Align

Mar 18, 2021

Decided

Both of us are far more familiar with GitHub than Gitlab, and so for our first big project together decided to go with what we know here instead of figuring out something new (there are so many new things we need to figure out, might as well reduce the number of optionally new things, lol). We aren't currently taking advantage of GitHub Actions or very many other built-in features (besides Dependabot) but luckily it integrates very well with the other services we're using.

409k views409k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
RhodeCode
RhodeCode

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
unified repository management across Mercurial, Git & SVN;full­-text source code search;web-­based code editor;built­-in code review tools;permission management system with IP restrictions;code snippets system (gists);authentication with LDAP, ActiveDirectory, BitBucket, Google & GitHub; integrations with Jira, RedMine, Jenkins
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
33
Followers
54.5K
Followers
42
Votes
2.5K
Votes
210
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 22
    Self hosted
  • 20
    Great performance
  • 19
    Integrations with CI / issue trackers
  • 19
    Multiple version control systems
  • 18
    Full text search
Cons
  • 0
    No easy installation for Windows
Integrations
No integrations available
Jira
Jira
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
Redmine
Redmine
TeamCity
TeamCity
Bamboo
Bamboo

What are some alternatives to GitLab, RhodeCode?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana