Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GitLab vs NetBeans IDE: What are the differences?
Introduction
GitLab and NetBeans IDE are both commonly used tools in software development, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features. In this analysis, we will explore the key differences between GitLab and NetBeans IDE.
Collaboration and Version Control: GitLab is primarily a collaboration and version control platform that provides an integrated set of tools for managing and tracking changes in software projects. It offers features like code versioning, code review, issue tracking, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD). On the other hand, NetBeans IDE is a full-fledged integrated development environment that provides a comprehensive set of tools for software development, including code editing, debugging, and project management capabilities. While both tools support version control, GitLab is designed specifically for collaboration and offers advanced features in this area.
Deployment and Hosting: GitLab provides hosting solutions for code repositories, enabling developers to store their projects on GitLab's servers. It offers features like workflows, pipelines, and environments for automating the deployment process. In contrast, NetBeans IDE does not offer hosting services. It focuses more on local development and supports integration with various external version control systems like Git, Subversion, and Mercurial.
Supported Programming Languages: GitLab supports a wide range of programming languages, including popular ones like JavaScript, Python, Ruby, Java, and C++. It provides language-specific features like syntax highlighting, code autocompletion, and code linting. NetBeans IDE, being a full-fledged IDE, supports a broader range of programming languages compared to GitLab. It offers extensive language support, including advanced features like refactoring, code generation, and debugging, for languages such as Java, PHP, C/C++, and HTML/CSS.
Integration with Third-Party Tools: GitLab integrates well with various third-party tools and services, making it easier to incorporate different stages of the development process into the overall workflow. It supports integrations with issue trackers like Jira and Redmine, continuous integration tools like Jenkins, and various cloud platforms for deployment. NetBeans IDE also provides integration options but is more focused on its built-in features rather than connecting with external tools. It has support for version control systems, Ant and Maven build systems, and some server platforms for deployment.
Community and Support: GitLab has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, forums, and resources available. It offers enterprise-grade support options for organizations that require professional assistance. NetBeans IDE, being an open-source project, also has an active community but may have comparatively fewer resources and support options compared to GitLab.
Pricing and Licensing: GitLab offers a range of editions with different pricing models, including a community edition that is free to use and self-hostable. It also provides paid editions with additional features and support options. NetBeans IDE, on the other hand, is an open-source tool released under the Apache license, which means it is free to use, modify, and distribute. There are no specific pricing models associated with NetBeans IDE.
In summary, GitLab is a collaborative platform primarily focused on version control, collaboration, and deployment, while NetBeans IDE is a comprehensive integrated development environment with advanced code editing, debugging, and project management features. GitLab offers hosting solutions, supports a wide range of programming languages, integrates with third-party tools, has an active community, and has different pricing models. NetBeans IDE, being open-source, has extensive language support, focuses on local development, and offers community-driven resources and support.
I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.
I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.
SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.
As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.
Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!
At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.
Pros of GitLab
- Self hosted508
- Free431
- Has community edition339
- Easy setup242
- Familiar interface240
- Includes many features, including ci137
- Nice UI113
- Good integration with gitlabci84
- Simple setup57
- Has an official mobile app35
- Free private repository34
- Continuous Integration31
- Open source, great ui (like github)23
- Slack Integration18
- Full CI flow15
- Free and unlimited private git repos11
- All in one (Git, CI, Agile..)10
- User, group, and project access management is simple10
- Intuitive UI8
- Built-in CI8
- Full DevOps suite with Git6
- Both public and private Repositories6
- Integrated Docker Registry5
- So easy to use5
- CI5
- Build/pipeline definition alongside code5
- It's powerful source code management tool5
- Dockerized4
- It's fully integrated4
- On-premises4
- Security and Stable4
- Unlimited free repos & collaborators4
- Not Microsoft Owned4
- Excellent4
- Issue system4
- Mattermost Chat client4
- Great for team collaboration3
- Free private repos3
- Because is the best remote host for git repositories3
- Built-in Docker Registry3
- Opensource3
- Low maintenance cost due omnibus-deployment3
- I like the its runners and executors feature3
- Beautiful2
- Groups of groups2
- Multilingual interface2
- Powerful software planning and maintaining tools2
- Review Apps feature2
- Kubernetes integration with GitLab CI2
- One-click install through DigitalOcean2
- Powerful Continuous Integration System2
- It includes everything I need, all packaged with docker2
- The dashboard with deployed environments2
- HipChat intergration2
- Many private repo2
- Kubernetes Integration2
- Published IP list for whitelisting (gl-infra#434)2
- Wounderful2
- Native CI2
- Supports Radius/Ldap & Browser Code Edits1
Pros of NetBeans IDE
- Rich features76
- Crossplatform69
- Plugins(Git, SVN)49
- Easy to use38
- Extensible38
- PHP Support35
- Java support34
- File History28
- Code analysis21
- MySQL support18
- Free14
- Open source14
- Code completion10
- Strong Maven Support9
- NodeJs support8
- Webdev king6
- Easy maven project start6
- Best6
- Jira Plugin4
- Foss4
- Out of the box integration with maven, git, svn3
- History of changes, friendly tabs3
- Mandatory3
- Intuitive ui2
- Chrome plugin to live update javascript from browser2
- Groovy support2
- Native Nette support2
- I don't like NetBeans2
- Smarty support2
- Visual GUI Builder for Swing / AWT2
- Custom html tags support2
- Powerful refactoring1
- Composer commands inside IDE1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GitLab
- Slow ui performance28
- Introduce breaking bugs every release9
- Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)6
- Built-in Docker Registry2
- Review Apps feature1
Cons of NetBeans IDE
- PHP debug doesn't support conditional breakpoints2
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is GitLab?
What is NetBeans IDE?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use GitLab?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with GitLab?
What tools integrate with NetBeans IDE?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+7