GitLab vs Gitrob

Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Gitrob

Stacks3

Followers18

Votes0

GitHub Stars6.1K

Forks844

GitLab vs Gitrob: What are the differences?

# Introduction
GitLab and Gitrob are both tools used in Git repository management and security analysis.

1. **Main Purpose**: GitLab is a web-based Git repository manager that provides features for code collaboration, code review, issue tracking, and continuous integration. On the other hand, Gitrob is a security tool used for searching sensitive files in repositories and organizations.

2. **User Base**: GitLab caters to developers, teams, and organizations looking for a comprehensive solution for source code management. Gitrob, on the other hand, is specifically designed for security professionals and penetration testers who need to identify and mitigate security risks in Git repositories.

3. **Functionality**: GitLab offers a wide range of features beyond just security analysis, including project planning, CI/CD pipelines, and extensive project management tools. Gitrob, however, focuses solely on scanning repositories for sensitive files, such as passwords, API keys, and other potentially harmful information.

4. **Integration**: GitLab can be integrated with various third-party tools and services to enhance its functionality and extend its capabilities. Gitrob, on the other hand, is a standalone tool that operates independently for security scans and analysis.

5. **Scanning Methodology**: GitLab primarily focuses on code management and collaboration, ensuring code quality and project delivery. Gitrob, on the other hand, performs deep scans of Git repositories to identify security vulnerabilities and potential data leaks.

6. **Community Support**: GitLab has a thriving community of developers, contributors, and users who actively participate in discussions, issue tracking, and feature development. Gitrob, being more specialized in security analysis, has a smaller but dedicated user base focused on cybersecurity and risk assessment.

In Summary, GitLab and Gitrob differ in their main purposes, user bases, functionality, integration capabilities, scanning methodologies, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitLab, Gitrob

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	Gitrob
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	Gitrob is a command line tool that can help organizations and security professionals find such sensitive information. The tool will iterate over all public organization and member repositories and match filenames against a range of patterns for files, that typically contain sensitive or dangerous information.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars 6.1K
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks 844
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 3
Followers 54.5K	Followers 18
Votes 2.5K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	GitHub

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Gitrob?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

GitLab vs Gitrob

Overview