GitKraken vs GitLab

Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

GitKraken

Stacks725

Followers909

Votes290

GitKraken vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitKraken and GitLab are both widely used tools in software development. While they both serve the purpose of version control, there are some key differences between the two.

Integration with Git providers: GitKraken is a Git GUI client that integrates with various Git hosting providers like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. On the other hand, GitLab is a web-based DevOps platform that provides a complete set of tools for managing and hosting repositories, issue tracking, CI/CD, and more. GitLab offers its own self-hosted solution, while GitKraken can be used with multiple Git providers.
User Interface: GitKraken provides a visually appealing and intuitive user interface that makes it easy for both beginners and experienced developers to visualize and understand Git workflows. It offers features like drag-and-drop commit merging, interactive commit graph, and seamless commits and pushes. GitLab, on the other hand, has a web-based UI that offers a range of functionalities beyond version control, including issue tracking, code review, and continuous integration.
Collaboration and Project Management Features: GitLab has built-in collaboration and project management features that allow teams to work efficiently. It provides issue tracking, code review, and merge request functionality, making it easier for team members to collaborate and review code changes. GitKraken focuses solely on version control and does not provide these additional project management features.
Hosting Options: GitLab offers both self-hosted and cloud-based options, giving users the flexibility to choose the deployment option that best suits their needs. The self-hosted option allows organizations to have complete control over their GitLab instance, while the cloud-based option eliminates the need for server maintenance. GitKraken, on the other hand, relies on external Git hosting providers for repository hosting.
Pricing Model: GitLab offers different pricing tiers, including a free community edition for self-hosted deployments, as well as paid plans for additional features and support. GitKraken also has a free version that is limited in terms of the number of repositories and features available. It offers a pro version with additional features, as well as a enterprise version for organizations with specific requirements.
Extensibility and Integrations: GitLab provides a wide range of integrations with popular development tools like Jira, Jenkins, and Slack. It also has an extensive API that allows users to extend its functionality and integrate with custom tools. GitKraken also offers integrations with various tools, but its focus is primarily on providing a seamless Git GUI experience.

In summary, GitKraken is primarily a Git GUI client that integrates with multiple Git hosting providers, while GitLab is a web-based DevOps platform that offers a comprehensive set of tools for managing repositories and project workflows. GitLab provides built-in collaboration and project management features, offers hosting options, and has a flexible pricing model. GitKraken, on the other hand, provides a visually appealing and user-friendly interface for Git workflows with integrations across different Git hosting providers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitLab, GitKraken

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	GitKraken
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 725
Followers 54.5K	Followers 909
Votes 2.5K	Votes 290
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	Pros 60 Dark theme 34 Best linux git client 29 Great overview 21 Full featured client 21 Gitflow support Cons 4 No edit/fixup in interactive rebase 4 Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree) 4 Extremely slow when working with large repositories 3 Not as many features as sourcetree 3 Do not allow to directly edit staging area
Integrations
No integrations available	Git

What are some alternatives to GitLab, GitKraken?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

GitKraken vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitKraken and GitLab are both widely used tools in software development. While they both serve the purpose of version control, there are some key differences between the two.

Integration with Git providers: GitKraken is a Git GUI client that integrates with various Git hosting providers like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. On the other hand, GitLab is a web-based DevOps platform that provides a complete set of tools for managing and hosting repositories, issue tracking, CI/CD, and more. GitLab offers its own self-hosted solution, while GitKraken can be used with multiple Git providers.
User Interface: GitKraken provides a visually appealing and intuitive user interface that makes it easy for both beginners and experienced developers to visualize and understand Git workflows. It offers features like drag-and-drop commit merging, interactive commit graph, and seamless commits and pushes. GitLab, on the other hand, has a web-based UI that offers a range of functionalities beyond version control, including issue tracking, code review, and continuous integration.
Collaboration and Project Management Features: GitLab has built-in collaboration and project management features that allow teams to work efficiently. It provides issue tracking, code review, and merge request functionality, making it easier for team members to collaborate and review code changes. GitKraken focuses solely on version control and does not provide these additional project management features.
Hosting Options: GitLab offers both self-hosted and cloud-based options, giving users the flexibility to choose the deployment option that best suits their needs. The self-hosted option allows organizations to have complete control over their GitLab instance, while the cloud-based option eliminates the need for server maintenance. GitKraken, on the other hand, relies on external Git hosting providers for repository hosting.
Pricing Model: GitLab offers different pricing tiers, including a free community edition for self-hosted deployments, as well as paid plans for additional features and support. GitKraken also has a free version that is limited in terms of the number of repositories and features available. It offers a pro version with additional features, as well as a enterprise version for organizations with specific requirements.
Extensibility and Integrations: GitLab provides a wide range of integrations with popular development tools like Jira, Jenkins, and Slack. It also has an extensive API that allows users to extend its functionality and integrate with custom tools. GitKraken also offers integrations with various tools, but its focus is primarily on providing a seamless Git GUI experience.

GitKraken vs GitLab

Overview

GitKraken vs GitLab: What are the differences?