Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Gitea

273
439
+ 1
118
SourceTree

10.4K
7.9K
+ 1
727
Add tool

Gitea vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Gitea and SourceTree are two popular tools used by developers for managing and version controlling their code repositories. Gitea is a self-hosted Git service written in Go, while SourceTree is a graphical user interface (GUI) client for managing Git and Mercurial repositories. Let's explore the key differences between Gitea and SourceTree:

  1. Hosting and Deployment: Gitea is a self-hosted solution, meaning developers need to set up and maintain their own Gitea server, providing them with complete control over their repositories and data. On the other hand, SourceTree is a client-side application that connects to remote Git and Mercurial repositories hosted on platforms like GitHub, Bitbucket, or GitLab. This allows developers to leverage existing hosted solutions and access their repositories from different services seamlessly.

  2. User Interface and Workflow: Gitea primarily operates as a web-based application, providing a user-friendly interface for managing repositories, issues, pull requests, and more. It offers an intuitive workflow for repository management, making it suitable for individual developers and small teams. SourceTree, as a desktop application, presents a visual and interactive interface that simplifies version control tasks and facilitates branching, merging, and code reviews. Its graphical approach is well-suited for developers who prefer a GUI-based workflow for their version control operations.

  3. Collaboration and Code Review: Gitea offers collaboration features like issue tracking and pull requests. However, since it is self-hosted, collaboration functionalities might depend on the configuration and plugins installed. In contrast, SourceTree focuses on integrating with popular code hosting services like GitHub and Bitbucket, which offer robust collaboration and code review features natively. This allows developers using SourceTree to benefit from the collaboration tools provided by these hosting platforms.

  4. Platform Compatibility: Gitea supports a wide range of platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it accessible to developers across different operating systems. Additionally, its self-hosted nature allows for deployment on various cloud or on-premises infrastructures. On the other hand, SourceTree is compatible with Windows and macOS, providing a unified experience across these platforms. However, it doesn't have native support for Linux, which may limit its usability for developers using Linux-based systems.

  5. Advanced Features and Customization: Gitea offers a variety of advanced features and customization options. As a self-hosted solution, developers have the freedom to customize Gitea's behavior and appearance, add plugins, and fine-tune the system to meet their requirements. SourceTree, being a client-side application, doesn't offer the same level of customization but focuses on providing a user-friendly, out-of-the-box experience for managing Git and Mercurial repositories with a visually appealing interface.

In summary, Gitea is a self-hosted Git service that provides full control and customization options, while SourceTree is a GUI client that excels in integrating with popular code hosting services and offering a straightforward, visual approach to version control for developers using Windows and macOS.

Decisions about Gitea and SourceTree
Kamaleshwar BN
Senior Software Engineer at Pulley · | 8 upvotes · 651K views

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

See more

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows * to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie) * it helps to investigate the history * most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Gitea
Pros of SourceTree
  • 23
    Self-hosted
  • 16
    Lightweight
  • 15
    Free
  • 12
    Simple
  • 9
    Easy Setup
  • 9
    Multiple code maintainers
  • 6
    Pull requests and code reviews
  • 5
    Import existing git repositories
  • 5
    Squash and Merge is supported
  • 5
    Written in Go
  • 4
    Nice gui
  • 3
    Run in Raspberry Pi
  • 2
    Community-fork of Gogs
  • 2
    LDAP Support
  • 1
    Richable Packages
  • 1
    Gitea Actions(Github compatible)
  • 205
    Visual history and branch view
  • 164
    Beautiful UI
  • 134
    Easy repository browsing
  • 87
    Gitflow support
  • 75
    Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines
  • 22
    Great branch visualization
  • 18
    Ui/ux and user-friendliness
  • 8
    Best Git Client UI/Features
  • 7
    Search commit messages
  • 5
    Available for Windows and macOS
  • 1
    Log only one file
  • 1
    Search file content

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Gitea
Cons of SourceTree
  • 3
    Community-fork of Gogs
  • 0
    Easy Windows authentication is not supported
  • 12
    Crashes often
  • 8
    So many bugs
  • 7
    Fetching is slow sometimes
  • 5
    No dark theme (Windows)
  • 5
    Extremely slow
  • 5
    Very unstable
  • 4
    Can't select text in diff (windows)
  • 3
    Freezes quite frequently
  • 3
    Can't scale window from top corners
  • 2
    UI blinking
  • 2
    Windows version worse than mac version
  • 2
    Installs to AppData folder (windows)
  • 2
    Diff makes tab indentation look like spaces
  • 2
    Windows and Mac versions are very different
  • 2
    Diff appears as if space indented even if its tabs
  • 2
    Doesn't have an option for git init
  • 2
    Useless for merge conflict resolution
  • 2
    Doesn't differentiate submodules from parent repos
  • 2
    Requires bitbucket account
  • 1
    Generally hard to like
  • 1
    No reflog support
  • 1
    Bases binary check on filesize
  • 1
    Can't add remotes by right clicking remotes (windows)

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Gitea?

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

What is SourceTree?

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Gitea?
What companies use SourceTree?
See which teams inside your own company are using Gitea or SourceTree.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Gitea?
What tools integrate with SourceTree?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Gitea and SourceTree?
Gogs
The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.
GitLab
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
Phabricator
Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.
Bitbucket
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
GitHub
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
See all alternatives