StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Static Site Generators
  5. Ghost vs Hexo

Ghost vs Hexo

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hexo
Hexo
Stacks358
Followers386
Votes70
GitHub Stars41.0K
Forks5.0K
Ghost
Ghost
Stacks518
Followers506
Votes219
GitHub Stars51.1K
Forks11.1K

Ghost vs Hexo: What are the differences?

  1. Hosting: Ghost is a fully managed platform, whereas Hexo is a static site generator that needs to be hosted on a separate server. This difference means that users have different levels of control and customization options based on their hosting preference.
  2. Themes and Templates: Ghost offers a wider variety of ready-to-use themes and templates compared to Hexo, making it easier for users to quickly set up and customize their website. Hexo, on the other hand, requires more manual coding and design work to create a unique website layout.
  3. Content Management: Ghost offers a user-friendly and intuitive content management system that simplifies the process of creating and publishing content. Hexo, being a static site generator, requires users to write content in Markdown and then generate the website, which may be less convenient for users who prefer a visual editor.
  4. Community Support: Hexo has a larger and more active open-source community compared to Ghost, which means users have access to more plugins, themes, and resources to enhance their website. Ghost's community, while growing, may have fewer resources available for users seeking customization options.
  5. Performance: Hexo, being a static site generator, tends to have faster loading times and better performance compared to Ghost, which relies on a database to generate dynamic content. This difference can be significant for users prioritizing website speed and SEO rankings.
  6. Scalability: Ghost is built for scalability and can handle high levels of traffic and complex websites more effectively compared to Hexo, which may have limitations in managing larger websites with extensive content. This difference is crucial for users planning to expand their website in the future.

In Summary, Ghost and Hexo differ in hosting, themes/templates, content management, community support, performance, and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Hexo, Ghost

Xander
Xander

Founder at Rate My Meeting

Mar 30, 2020

Decided

So many choices for CMSs these days. So then what do you choose if speed, security and customization are key? Headless for one. Consuming your own APIs for content is absolute key. It makes designing pages in the front-end a breeze. Leaving Ghost and Cockpit. If I then looked at the footprint and impact on server load, Cockpit definitely wins that battle.

243k views243k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hexo
Hexo
Ghost
Ghost

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Blazing Fast - Node.js brings you incredible generating speed. Hundreds of files take only seconds to build.;Markdown Support - All features of GitHub Flavored Markdown are supported. You can even use most Octopress plugins in Hexo.;One-Command Deployment - You only need one command to deploy your site to GitHub Pages, Heroku or other sites.;Various Plugins - Hexo has a powerful plugin system. You can install more plugins for Jade, CoffeeScript plugins.
An intuitive, minimal editor; Ultra-fast content management; All SEO features built-in natively; Native desktop & mobile apps; Publish once, distribute everywhere; Headless CMS with Node.js REST APIs; Over 19x faster than WordPress; Secure & independently audited; Custom theme or any JAMstack front-end
Statistics
GitHub Stars
41.0K
GitHub Stars
51.1K
GitHub Forks
5.0K
GitHub Forks
11.1K
Stacks
358
Stacks
518
Followers
386
Followers
506
Votes
70
Votes
219
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 18
    Ease of deployment
  • 13
    Uses NodeJS and npm
  • 12
    Easy GitHub Pages publishing
  • 10
    Powerful templating
  • 7
    Useful tools and plugins
Pros
  • 45
    Beautiful
  • 35
    Fast
  • 29
    Quick/simple post styling
  • 20
    Live Post Preview
  • 20
    Open source
Integrations
TypeScript
TypeScript
Netlify
Netlify
CoffeeScript
CoffeeScript
Heroku
Heroku
Node.js
Node.js
GitHub Pages
GitHub Pages
Azure Search
Azure Search
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Hexo, Ghost?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Jekyll

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Hugo

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

Gatsby

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

Middleman

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope