Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Gerrit Code Review vs Gogs: What are the differences?
Introduction
Gerrit Code Review and Gogs are both popular software tools used for code review and collaboration in software development teams. While they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between these two platforms. This markdown document aims to provide a concise comparison of these differences.
Integration and Ecosystem: Gerrit Code Review is tightly integrated with Git and offers seamless integration with popular version control systems such as Git, GitHub, and GitLab. It provides a rich ecosystem of plugins and extensions for customization. On the other hand, Gogs is also Git-based but lacks the extensive integration options and ecosystem provided by Gerrit.
Code Review Workflow: Gerrit Code Review utilizes a sophisticated code review workflow, providing features like fine-grained access controls, branch permissions, and detailed change tracking. It offers a comprehensive set of review features, including inline commenting, reviewing patches, and approval workflows. Gogs, on the other hand, offers a simpler code review workflow with basic features like pull requests and code commenting.
Enterprise-grade Scalability: Gerrit Code Review is designed to handle large-scale codebases and can efficiently handle thousands of concurrent users. It provides robust support for distributed development and can handle complex branching and merging scenarios. Gogs, while suitable for small to medium-sized teams, may not scale as well for enterprise-level deployments.
Authentication and Authorization: Gerrit Code Review supports a wide range of authentication mechanisms, including LDAP, OpenID, and OAuth. It provides flexible permission controls, allowing administrators to define fine-grained access policies. Gogs also supports authentication mechanisms such as LDAP and OAuth but may not offer the same level of flexibility in permission management as Gerrit.
User Interface: Gerrit Code Review has a more comprehensive and sophisticated user interface, specifically designed for code review and collaboration. It offers features like side-by-side diff views, syntax highlighting, and powerful search capabilities. Gogs, while providing a user-friendly interface, may not offer the same level of advanced features and customization options as Gerrit.
Community Support and Development: Gerrit Code Review has a strong and active open-source community, with extensive documentation, forums, and regular updates. It is backed by Google and has a large user base. Gogs, while also open-source, may not have the same level of community support and development resources as Gerrit.
In summary, Gerrit Code Review provides a more powerful and feature-rich platform for code review and collaboration, with extensive integration options, advanced code review workflows, scalability for large codebases, flexible authentication and authorization mechanisms, advanced user interface, and strong community support. Gogs, on the other hand, offers a simpler and more lightweight solution suitable for small to medium-sized teams.
Pros of Gerrit Code Review
- Code review13
- Good workflow11
- Cleaner repository story10
- Open source9
- Good integration with Jenkins9
- Unlimited repo support5
- Comparison dashboard2
Pros of Gogs
- Self-hosted github like service36
- Very low memory footprint31
- Easy to install / update29
- Lightweight (low minimal req.) runs on Raspberry pi17
- Single binary deploy no dependencies16
- Open source14
- Cross platform (MacOS, Windows, Linux ...)12
- Wiki11
- Issue tracker10
- Great UI3
- LDAP Support3