Gerrit Code Review vs Gogs

Overview

Gogs

Stacks175

Followers306

Votes182

Gerrit Code Review

Stacks116

Followers223

Votes67

Gerrit Code Review vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction

Gerrit Code Review and Gogs are both popular software tools used for code review and collaboration in software development teams. While they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between these two platforms. This markdown document aims to provide a concise comparison of these differences.

Integration and Ecosystem: Gerrit Code Review is tightly integrated with Git and offers seamless integration with popular version control systems such as Git, GitHub, and GitLab. It provides a rich ecosystem of plugins and extensions for customization. On the other hand, Gogs is also Git-based but lacks the extensive integration options and ecosystem provided by Gerrit.
Code Review Workflow: Gerrit Code Review utilizes a sophisticated code review workflow, providing features like fine-grained access controls, branch permissions, and detailed change tracking. It offers a comprehensive set of review features, including inline commenting, reviewing patches, and approval workflows. Gogs, on the other hand, offers a simpler code review workflow with basic features like pull requests and code commenting.
Enterprise-grade Scalability: Gerrit Code Review is designed to handle large-scale codebases and can efficiently handle thousands of concurrent users. It provides robust support for distributed development and can handle complex branching and merging scenarios. Gogs, while suitable for small to medium-sized teams, may not scale as well for enterprise-level deployments.
Authentication and Authorization: Gerrit Code Review supports a wide range of authentication mechanisms, including LDAP, OpenID, and OAuth. It provides flexible permission controls, allowing administrators to define fine-grained access policies. Gogs also supports authentication mechanisms such as LDAP and OAuth but may not offer the same level of flexibility in permission management as Gerrit.
User Interface: Gerrit Code Review has a more comprehensive and sophisticated user interface, specifically designed for code review and collaboration. It offers features like side-by-side diff views, syntax highlighting, and powerful search capabilities. Gogs, while providing a user-friendly interface, may not offer the same level of advanced features and customization options as Gerrit.
Community Support and Development: Gerrit Code Review has a strong and active open-source community, with extensive documentation, forums, and regular updates. It is backed by Google and has a large user base. Gogs, while also open-source, may not have the same level of community support and development resources as Gerrit.

In summary, Gerrit Code Review provides a more powerful and feature-rich platform for code review and collaboration, with extensive integration options, advanced code review workflows, scalability for large codebases, flexible authentication and authorization mechanisms, advanced user interface, and strong community support. Gogs, on the other hand, offers a simpler and more lightweight solution suitable for small to medium-sized teams.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gogs	Gerrit Code Review
The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.	Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.
Activity timeline;SSH/HTTP(S) protocol support;SMTP/LDAP/reverse proxy authentication support;Register/delete/rename account;Create/migrate/mirror/delete/watch/rename/transfer public/private repository;Repository viewer/release/issue tracker/webhooks;Add/remove repository collaborators;Gravatar and cache support;Mail service(register, issue);Administration panel;Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL and SQLite3;Social account login(GitHub, Google, QQ, Weibo)	git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
Stacks 175	Stacks 116
Followers 306	Followers 223
Votes 182	Votes 67
Pros & Cons
Pros 36 Self-hosted github like service 31 Very low memory footprint 29 Easy to install / update 17 Lightweight (low minimal req.) runs on Raspberry pi 16 Single binary deploy no dependencies	Pros 14 Code review 12 Good workflow 11 Cleaner repository story 10 Open source 10 Good integration with Jenkins
Integrations
No integrations available	Git

What are some alternatives to Gogs, Gerrit Code Review?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Related Comparisons

Gerrit Code Review vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction

Integration and Ecosystem: Gerrit Code Review is tightly integrated with Git and offers seamless integration with popular version control systems such as Git, GitHub, and GitLab. It provides a rich ecosystem of plugins and extensions for customization. On the other hand, Gogs is also Git-based but lacks the extensive integration options and ecosystem provided by Gerrit.
Code Review Workflow: Gerrit Code Review utilizes a sophisticated code review workflow, providing features like fine-grained access controls, branch permissions, and detailed change tracking. It offers a comprehensive set of review features, including inline commenting, reviewing patches, and approval workflows. Gogs, on the other hand, offers a simpler code review workflow with basic features like pull requests and code commenting.
Enterprise-grade Scalability: Gerrit Code Review is designed to handle large-scale codebases and can efficiently handle thousands of concurrent users. It provides robust support for distributed development and can handle complex branching and merging scenarios. Gogs, while suitable for small to medium-sized teams, may not scale as well for enterprise-level deployments.
Authentication and Authorization: Gerrit Code Review supports a wide range of authentication mechanisms, including LDAP, OpenID, and OAuth. It provides flexible permission controls, allowing administrators to define fine-grained access policies. Gogs also supports authentication mechanisms such as LDAP and OAuth but may not offer the same level of flexibility in permission management as Gerrit.
User Interface: Gerrit Code Review has a more comprehensive and sophisticated user interface, specifically designed for code review and collaboration. It offers features like side-by-side diff views, syntax highlighting, and powerful search capabilities. Gogs, while providing a user-friendly interface, may not offer the same level of advanced features and customization options as Gerrit.
Community Support and Development: Gerrit Code Review has a strong and active open-source community, with extensive documentation, forums, and regular updates. It is backed by Google and has a large user base. Gogs, while also open-source, may not have the same level of community support and development resources as Gerrit.

Gerrit Code Review vs Gogs

Overview