Gerrit Code Review vs GitLab

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Gerrit Code Review

+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Gerrit Code Review vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Gerrit Code Review and GitLab are both popular tools used for version control and code collaboration. Let's explore the key differences between Gerrit Code Review and GitLab.

  1. Code Review Process: Gerrit Code Review is specifically designed for code reviews. It offers a highly configurable and streamlined code review process with features like inline commenting, line-by-line change comparison, and approval workflows. GitLab, on the other hand, provides a more integrated approach, combining code review with other project management features such as issue tracking and continuous integration.

  2. Access Control: Gerrit Code Review places a strong emphasis on access control and permissions. It allows administrators to define fine-grained access rules for each repository, branch, or even individual files. This level of control is especially useful in large organizations with strict security requirements. GitLab also provides access control features but with a more simplified approach, making it easier to manage permissions in smaller teams.

  3. Integration with CI/CD: GitLab has a comprehensive integrated CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment) pipeline that allows developers to automate build, test, and deployment processes. This means that GitLab provides a more seamless and streamlined experience when it comes to integrating code changes with the development and deployment workflow. Gerrit Code Review, on the other hand, focuses primarily on code review and does not have built-in CI/CD functionality.

  4. Issue Tracking and Project Management: GitLab offers a complete suite of project management features, including issue tracking, Kanban boards, and milestone tracking. This makes it convenient for teams to have all project-related activities in one place. Gerrit Code Review, on the other hand, does not prioritize project management features and is primarily focused on code review.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: GitLab has a larger and more active community compared to Gerrit Code Review. This means there is a wider range of plugins, integrations, and community-contributed resources available for GitLab users. Gerrit has a more niche user base, primarily focused on organizations with a strong code review culture.

  6. User Interface and User Experience: GitLab provides a more polished and user-friendly interface with a modern and intuitive design. It offers a customizable dashboard that allows users to easily track their projects and tasks. Gerrit Code Review, while functional, has a more minimalistic and less visually appealing interface.

In summary, Gerrit Code Review focuses primarily on providing a streamlined and configurable code review process with strong access control. GitLab, on the other hand, offers a more integrated approach with features like built-in CI/CD, project management, and a larger community.

Decisions about Gerrit Code Review and GitLab
Elmar Wouters
CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media · | 7 upvotes · 528.1K views

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

See more
Weverton Timoteo

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

See more
Kamaleshwar BN
Senior Software Engineer at Pulley · | 8 upvotes · 677.2K views

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

See more

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

See more
Nazar Atamaniuk
Shared insights

At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Gerrit Code Review
Pros of GitLab
  • 13
    Code review
  • 11
    Good workflow
  • 10
    Cleaner repository story
  • 9
    Open source
  • 9
    Good integration with Jenkins
  • 5
    Unlimited repo support
  • 2
    Comparison dashboard
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
  • 137
    Includes many features, including ci
  • 113
    Nice UI
  • 84
    Good integration with gitlabci
  • 57
    Simple setup
  • 35
    Has an official mobile app
  • 34
    Free private repository
  • 31
    Continuous Integration
  • 23
    Open source, great ui (like github)
  • 18
    Slack Integration
  • 15
    Full CI flow
  • 11
    Free and unlimited private git repos
  • 10
    All in one (Git, CI, Agile..)
  • 10
    User, group, and project access management is simple
  • 8
    Intuitive UI
  • 8
    Built-in CI
  • 6
    Full DevOps suite with Git
  • 6
    Both public and private Repositories
  • 5
    Integrated Docker Registry
  • 5
    So easy to use
  • 5
  • 5
    Build/pipeline definition alongside code
  • 5
    It's powerful source code management tool
  • 4
  • 4
    It's fully integrated
  • 4
  • 4
    Security and Stable
  • 4
    Unlimited free repos & collaborators
  • 4
    Not Microsoft Owned
  • 4
  • 4
    Issue system
  • 4
    Mattermost Chat client
  • 3
    Great for team collaboration
  • 3
    Free private repos
  • 3
    Because is the best remote host for git repositories
  • 3
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 3
  • 3
    Low maintenance cost due omnibus-deployment
  • 3
    I like the its runners and executors feature
  • 2
  • 2
    Groups of groups
  • 2
    Multilingual interface
  • 2
    Powerful software planning and maintaining tools
  • 2
    Review Apps feature
  • 2
    Kubernetes integration with GitLab CI
  • 2
    One-click install through DigitalOcean
  • 2
    Powerful Continuous Integration System
  • 2
    It includes everything I need, all packaged with docker
  • 2
    The dashboard with deployed environments
  • 2
    HipChat intergration
  • 2
    Many private repo
  • 2
    Kubernetes Integration
  • 2
    Published IP list for whitelisting (gl-infra#434)
  • 2
  • 2
    Native CI
  • 1
    Supports Radius/Ldap & Browser Code Edits

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Gerrit Code Review
Cons of GitLab
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 28
      Slow ui performance
    • 9
      Introduce breaking bugs every release
    • 6
      Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
    • 2
      Built-in Docker Registry
    • 1
      Review Apps feature

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Gerrit Code Review?

    Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

    What is GitLab?

    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Gerrit Code Review?
    What companies use GitLab?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Gerrit Code Review or GitLab.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Gerrit Code Review?
    What tools integrate with GitLab?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Gerrit Code Review and GitLab?
    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
    Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
    Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.
    See all alternatives