Gerrit Code Review vs GitKraken

Overview

Gerrit Code Review

Stacks116

Followers223

Votes67

GitKraken

Stacks725

Followers909

Votes290

Gerrit Code Review vs GitKraken: What are the differences?

Workflow Support: Gerrit Code Review is specifically designed for code review workflows, providing a robust platform for team collaboration and code reviews. GitKraken, on the other hand, is primarily focused on providing a visual interface for Git operations, lacking the specialized code review features of Gerrit.
Access Control: Gerrit Code Review offers granular access control capabilities, allowing administrators to define fine-grained permissions for users and branches. This level of control is not as comprehensive in GitKraken, which primarily relies on Git for access control.
Integration with Git: While both Gerrit and GitKraken are built on top of Git, Gerrit is a server-side solution that integrates closely with Git repositories, providing additional features like code review and continuous integration. GitKraken is a client-side application that offers a visual interface for interacting with Git repositories but does not have the same level of deep integration as Gerrit.
Extensibility: Gerrit Code Review can be extended through a robust plugin architecture, allowing users to customize and enhance the platform with additional features and integrations. GitKraken, on the other hand, does not currently offer the same level of extensibility and customization options.
Code Review Process: Gerrit Code Review enforces a strict code review process where changes must be reviewed before being merged into the codebase. GitKraken, while supporting code reviews, does not have the same level of process enforcement as Gerrit.
Web-based Interface: Gerrit Code Review provides a web-based interface for code reviews, making it accessible from any device with an internet connection. GitKraken, while offering a visual interface, is primarily a desktop application and does not have a dedicated web-based interface for code reviews.

In Summary, Gerrit Code Review and GitKraken differ in their workflow support, access control, integration with Git, extensibility, code review process, and web-based interface.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gerrit Code Review	GitKraken
Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.	The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories	-
Statistics
Stacks 116	Stacks 725
Followers 223	Followers 909
Votes 67	Votes 290
Pros & Cons
Pros 14 Code review 12 Good workflow 11 Cleaner repository story 10 Open source 10 Good integration with Jenkins	Pros 60 Dark theme 34 Best linux git client 29 Great overview 21 Full featured client 21 Gitflow support Cons 4 No edit/fixup in interactive rebase 4 Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree) 4 Extremely slow when working with large repositories 3 Not as many features as sourcetree 3 Does not work like a Mac app
Integrations
Git	Git

What are some alternatives to Gerrit Code Review, GitKraken?

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Sublime Merge

A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Related Comparisons

Gerrit Code Review vs GitKraken: What are the differences?

Workflow Support: Gerrit Code Review is specifically designed for code review workflows, providing a robust platform for team collaboration and code reviews. GitKraken, on the other hand, is primarily focused on providing a visual interface for Git operations, lacking the specialized code review features of Gerrit.
Access Control: Gerrit Code Review offers granular access control capabilities, allowing administrators to define fine-grained permissions for users and branches. This level of control is not as comprehensive in GitKraken, which primarily relies on Git for access control.
Integration with Git: While both Gerrit and GitKraken are built on top of Git, Gerrit is a server-side solution that integrates closely with Git repositories, providing additional features like code review and continuous integration. GitKraken is a client-side application that offers a visual interface for interacting with Git repositories but does not have the same level of deep integration as Gerrit.
Extensibility: Gerrit Code Review can be extended through a robust plugin architecture, allowing users to customize and enhance the platform with additional features and integrations. GitKraken, on the other hand, does not currently offer the same level of extensibility and customization options.
Code Review Process: Gerrit Code Review enforces a strict code review process where changes must be reviewed before being merged into the codebase. GitKraken, while supporting code reviews, does not have the same level of process enforcement as Gerrit.
Web-based Interface: Gerrit Code Review provides a web-based interface for code reviews, making it accessible from any device with an internet connection. GitKraken, while offering a visual interface, is primarily a desktop application and does not have a dedicated web-based interface for code reviews.

In Summary, Gerrit Code Review and GitKraken differ in their workflow support, access control, integration with Git, extensibility, code review process, and web-based interface.

Gerrit Code Review vs GitKraken

Overview