Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Fossil

8
25
+ 1
6
GitBucket

82
176
+ 1
36
Add tool

Fossil vs GitBucket: What are the differences?

  1. Hosting: Fossil comes with a built-in web interface for managing repositories, while GitBucket requires additional installation and setup of a separate web server like Apache or Nginx for hosting repositories.
  2. Built-in Wiki: Fossil includes a built-in wiki system for documentation and notes, while GitBucket does not have a built-in wiki feature, requiring users to use external tools for documentation.
  3. Ticketing System: Fossil provides an integrated ticketing system for issue tracking and project management, whereas GitBucket lacks this feature and relies on third-party integrations for issue management.
  4. Merge Workflow: Fossil follows an "autosync" merge strategy by default, automatically pushing changes to the remote repository, while GitBucket uses a more manual approach, requiring developers to manually push and pull changes.
  5. Accessibility: Fossil is designed to be a self-contained, single executable file, making it easier to set up and use compared to GitBucket, which requires multiple components and dependencies for installation and configuration.
  6. Community Support: GitBucket has a larger community and ecosystem, with more plugins and integrations available, while Fossil has a smaller user base and fewer third-party extensions.

In Summary, Fossil and GitBucket differ in hosting capabilities, built-in features like wikis and ticketing systems, merge workflows, accessibility, and community support.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Fossil
Pros of GitBucket
  • 2
    Integrated Bug Tracking, Wiki and Tech Notes
  • 1
    Dead simple & single binary with tons of features
  • 1
    Strong and flexible
  • 1
    Cheap&intelligent
  • 1
    AutoSync - Reduces needless Merging and Forking
  • 8
    Self hosted
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Familiar interface
  • 5
    Simple setup
  • 5
    Scala
  • 2
    Cross platform
  • 1
    SSH keys
  • 1
    Gists
  • 1
    Free

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Fossil?

Fossil is a software configuration management system. Fossil is software that is designed to control and track the development of a software project and to record the history of the project. There are many such systems in use today. Fossil strives to distinguish itself from the others by being extremely simple to setup and operate.

What is GitBucket?

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Fossil?
What companies use GitBucket?
    No companies found
    See which teams inside your own company are using Fossil or GitBucket.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Fossil?
    What tools integrate with GitBucket?
    What are some alternatives to Fossil and GitBucket?
    Helix
    Helix allows you to write Ruby classes in Rust without having to write the glue code yourself.
    Git
    Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
    GitHub
    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
    GitLab
    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
    Bitbucket
    Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
    See all alternatives