Forgerock Identity vs Ping Identity: What are the differences?

Introduction

Forgerock Identity and Ping Identity are both comprehensive identity and access management (IAM) solutions that enable organizations to secure their digital identities and protect sensitive data. Although they share similar goals, there are key differences that set them apart. In this comparison, we will highlight six main differences between Forgerock Identity and Ping Identity.

1. Platform Architecture: Forgerock Identity offers a modern, modular, and cloud-ready platform architecture that allows organizations to scale and adapt to their changing IAM needs. It supports multiple deployment models, including on-premises, hybrid, and multi-cloud. On the other hand, Ping Identity's platform architecture is built on a legacy foundation and lacks the same level of flexibility, scalability, and cloud-native capabilities.

2. Product Suite and Features: Forgerock Identity provides a comprehensive suite of products and features that cover a wide range of IAM capabilities, including identity management, access management, directory services, and more. It offers a seamless user experience and is highly customizable to meet specific business requirements. In contrast, Ping Identity offers a more focused set of products with limited feature sets, primarily focusing on access management and single sign-on, which may not cater to all IAM needs.

3. Integration Capabilities: Forgerock Identity is known for its strong integration capabilities, allowing seamless integration with various systems, applications, and third-party solutions. It provides out-of-the-box connectors, APIs, and SDKs for easy integration, making it suitable for complex and heterogeneous IT environments. On the other hand, Ping Identity has a more limited set of integration options, which may require additional effort and resources for custom integrations.

4. Scalability and Performance: Forgerock Identity boasts excellent scalability and performance, capable of handling millions of users and transactions. It leverages modern technologies and scalable architectures, ensuring high availability and reliability under heavy loads. Ping Identity, while also scalable to a certain extent, may face challenges in handling large-scale implementations or high transaction volumes due to its legacy architecture and less optimized performance.

5. Support and Community: Forgerock Identity has a vibrant community and strong support ecosystem, providing extensive documentation, forums, and resources to help users with their implementation and troubleshooting needs. It also offers comprehensive customer support and professional services. In comparison, Ping Identity has a smaller community and support ecosystem, which may result in limited resources and support options for users.

6. Pricing Model: Forgerock Identity follows a flexible pricing model based on the number of users and modules required, allowing organizations to scale their IAM investments as needed. It offers both perpetual and subscription-based licensing options. On the other hand, Ping Identity primarily adopts a user-based subscription pricing model, which may result in higher costs for organizations that require access to a wider range of product features.

In summary, Forgerock Identity stands out with its modern platform architecture, comprehensive product suite, strong integration capabilities, scalability, community support, and flexible pricing model. Ping Identity, while still a robust IAM solution, lags behind in terms of platform architecture, product suite, integration capabilities, scalability, community support, and pricing model.