StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Network Monitoring
  5. Forescout vs Wireshark

Forescout vs Wireshark

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Wireshark
Wireshark
Stacks95
Followers57
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.6K
Forks2.1K
Forescout
Forescout
Stacks3
Followers17
Votes0

Forescout vs Wireshark: What are the differences?

  1. Installation: Forescout is an agentless solution that can be deployed quickly across a network, whereas Wireshark requires installation on individual devices to capture network data.
  2. Use Case: Forescout is primarily used for network access control and device visibility, while Wireshark is primarily used for network traffic analysis and troubleshooting.
  3. Real-time Vs Packet Analysis: Forescout provides real-time monitoring and control of network devices, while Wireshark captures and analyzes packet-level data for post-incident analysis.
  4. Visibility: Forescout offers comprehensive visibility into devices connected to the network, including IoT devices, endpoints, and servers, while Wireshark provides detailed visibility into network traffic and protocols.
  5. Automation: Forescout offers automation capabilities for network access control and response actions, while Wireshark requires manual analysis and intervention for troubleshooting and security incidents.
  6. Scalability: Forescout is designed for large-scale deployments in complex networks, providing centralized management and scalability features, whereas Wireshark is more suitable for smaller-scale network analysis on individual devices.

In Summary, Forescout and Wireshark have distinct differences in terms of installation, use case, real-time monitoring, visibility, automation, and scalability in network monitoring and analysis.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Wireshark
Wireshark
Forescout
Forescout

It is the world’s foremost and widely-used network protocol analyzer. It lets you see what’s happening on your network at a microscopic level and is the de facto standard across many commercial and non-profit enterprises, government agencies, and educational institutions.

It is a platform that provides continuous security monitoring and mitigation. It allows IT organizations to efficiently address numerous access, endpoint compliance and threat management challenges even within today's complex, dynamic and expansive enterprise networks.

Deep inspection of hundreds of protocols, with more being added all the time; Live capture and offline analysis; Standard three-pane packet browser; Multi-platform: Runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, Solaris, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and many others; Captured network data can be browsed via a GUI, or via the TTY-mode TShark utility
Device visibility; Continuous compliance enforcement; Design & Deploy Network Segmentation; Orchestrate Infrastructure-Wide Security
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
95
Stacks
3
Followers
57
Followers
17
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Oracle Solaris
Oracle Solaris
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Wireshark, Forescout?

Riemann

Riemann

Riemann aggregates events from your servers and applications with a powerful stream processing language. Send an email for every exception in your app. Track the latency distribution of your web app. See the top processes on any host, by memory and CPU.

Packetbeat

Packetbeat

Packetbeat agents sniff the traffic between your application processes, parse on the fly protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Postgresql or REDIS and correlate the messages into transactions.

Observium

Observium

It is a low-maintenance auto-discovering network monitoring platform supporting a wide range of device types, platforms and operating systems

Beats

Beats

Beats is the platform for single-purpose data shippers. They send data from hundreds or thousands of machines and systems to Logstash or Elasticsearch.

PRTG

PRTG

It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.

LibreNMS

LibreNMS

It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more.

Tailscale

Tailscale

It connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Create a secure network between your servers, computers, and cloud instances. Even when separated by firewalls or subnets, Tailscale just works. It makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

Snort

Snort

It is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.

Nagios XI

Nagios XI

It is the most powerful and trusted network monitoring software on the market. It extends on proven, enterprise-class Open Source components to deliver the best network, server and application monitoring solution for today's demanding organizational requirements.

Pi-hole

Pi-hole

It is a DNS sinkhole that protects your devices from unwanted content, without installing any client-side software. You can run it in a container, or deploy it directly to a supported operating system via our automated installer.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana