Fly.js vs Microbundle

Overview

Fly.js

Stacks2

Followers13

Votes0

Microbundle

Stacks30

Followers36

Votes2

GitHub Stars8.1K

Forks361

Fly.js vs Microbundle: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Fly.js and Microbundle, both popular tools used for managing JavaScript builds and bundling.

JavaScript Support: Fly.js is primarily designed for JavaScript developers who prefer a functional programming style, whereas Microbundle is more focused on simplicity, catering to developers who favor a minimalist approach to build tools.
Configuration Complexity: Fly.js requires a bit more configuration and setup compared to Microbundle, which offers a more straightforward and less rigid configuration process for quick bundling and building of projects.
Plugin Ecosystem: Fly.js boasts a robust plugin ecosystem that allows developers to extend its functionality with various plugins, while Microbundle offers a more lightweight ecosystem with fewer plugins available for customization.
Community and Documentation: Microbundle has a more extensive community and better-documented resources compared to Fly.js, making it easier for developers to find help and resources when facing challenges or learning how to use the tool effectively.
File Size Optimization: Microbundle excels in optimizing file sizes for production builds, providing better performance and load times compared to Fly.js, which may require additional configuration or plugins to achieve similar optimizations.
Output Format Options: Fly.js offers more diverse options for output formats, including ES modules and UMD, giving developers greater flexibility in how they bundle and export their code compared to Microbundle, which focuses more on simplicity in output formats.

In Summary, Fly.js and Microbundle differ in their target audiences, configuration complexity, plugin ecosystems, community support, file size optimization, and output format options when it comes to JavaScript build and bundling tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Fly.js	Microbundle
Fly is a modern build system for Node based in co-routines, generators and promises. Fly has robust error handling, callback heaven, cascading tasks, parallel execution and a simple API. See the documentation to learn more about how to use Fly and write your own plugins.	Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.
-	Bundles your library using nothing but a package.json; Support for ESnext & async/await; Supports multiple entry modules; Creates multiple output formats for each entry; Build-in Uglify compression & gzipped bundle size tracking
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 8.1K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 361
Stacks 2	Stacks 30
Followers 13	Followers 36
Votes 0	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 1 Works well with TypeScript 1 All the best Terser and Rollup settings already set
Integrations
No integrations available	JavaScript npm

What are some alternatives to Fly.js, Microbundle?

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

System.js

It is a Universal Module Loader for JavaScript. If you've used RequireJs or a CommonJs bundler in the past, you have probably created modules.Configurable module loader enabling dynamic ES module workflows in browsers and NodeJS.

Related Comparisons

Fly.js vs Microbundle: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Fly.js and Microbundle, both popular tools used for managing JavaScript builds and bundling.

JavaScript Support: Fly.js is primarily designed for JavaScript developers who prefer a functional programming style, whereas Microbundle is more focused on simplicity, catering to developers who favor a minimalist approach to build tools.
Configuration Complexity: Fly.js requires a bit more configuration and setup compared to Microbundle, which offers a more straightforward and less rigid configuration process for quick bundling and building of projects.
Plugin Ecosystem: Fly.js boasts a robust plugin ecosystem that allows developers to extend its functionality with various plugins, while Microbundle offers a more lightweight ecosystem with fewer plugins available for customization.
Community and Documentation: Microbundle has a more extensive community and better-documented resources compared to Fly.js, making it easier for developers to find help and resources when facing challenges or learning how to use the tool effectively.
File Size Optimization: Microbundle excels in optimizing file sizes for production builds, providing better performance and load times compared to Fly.js, which may require additional configuration or plugins to achieve similar optimizations.
Output Format Options: Fly.js offers more diverse options for output formats, including ES modules and UMD, giving developers greater flexibility in how they bundle and export their code compared to Microbundle, which focuses more on simplicity in output formats.

Fly.js vs Microbundle

Overview