StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Beta Testing Mobile App Distribution
  5. Fabric vs TestFlight

Fabric vs TestFlight

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestFlight
TestFlight
Stacks1.1K
Followers705
Votes163
Fabric
Fabric
Stacks494
Followers307
Votes75
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.0K

Fabric vs TestFlight: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Platform Compatibility**: Fabric is primarily designed for iOS and Android platforms, while TestFlight is exclusively for iOS apps. Fabric provides support for both major mobile operating systems, making it a more versatile option for developers working on multi-platform apps.
2. **Integration with Analytics and Crash Reporting**: Fabric offers seamless integration with its own suite of tools, including Crashlytics for crash reporting and Answers for app usage analytics. TestFlight, on the other hand, lacks these integrated features, requiring developers to rely on third-party tools for similar functionalities.
3. **Distribution Method**: Fabric allows for beta app distribution through its Beta app distribution platform. TestFlight, owned by Apple, is geared towards iOS app distribution exclusively through the App Store Connect portal, limiting its use to Apple's ecosystem.
4. **Developer Interaction and Feedback**: Fabric provides robust tools for developers to collect feedback from beta testers directly within the platform, facilitating communication and collaboration. TestFlight offers basic feedback mechanisms but lacks the advanced features available in Fabric for developer interaction.
5. **Control and Customization**: Fabric offers more control and customization options for beta app distribution, allowing developers to tailor the user experience and testing process. TestFlight, being more tightly integrated into Apple's ecosystem, offers limited customization capabilities compared to Fabric.
6. **Limitations on Beta Tester Numbers**: Fabric allows developers to distribute beta apps to a larger number of testers compared to TestFlight, which has a cap on the number of testers per app build, potentially limiting the scope of beta testing.

In Summary, Fabric provides broader platform compatibility, integrated analytics and crash reporting, customizable distribution methods, and enhanced developer interaction compared to TestFlight, making it a versatile and comprehensive tool for beta app testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestFlight
TestFlight
Fabric
Fabric

With TestFlight, developers simply upload a build, and the testers can install it directly from their device, over the air.

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

Sessions- Discover how testers are using your application. Watch as they progress and take unexpected turns.;Crash Reports- Reported in realtime, with environment snapshots and full session activity.;In-App Questions- The most effective way to get tester feedback. Get the answers you need by asking questions the moment a checkpoint is passed.;Checkpoints- Place checkpoints throughout your app to see how far testers are getting, confirm which areas are popular and reveal ones that need more testing.;Remote Logging- TFLogs are attached to your session and crash reports.;In-App Updates- Prompt testers to install the latest version of your app. This is the easiest way for your testers to take advantage of installing on the fly.
Lets you execute arbitrary Python functions via the command line;Library of subroutines (built on top of a lower-level library) to make executing shell commands over SSH easy and Pythonic
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
1.1K
Stacks
494
Followers
705
Followers
307
Votes
163
Votes
75
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Must have for ios development
  • 49
    Beta testing
  • 20
    Easy setup
  • 10
    Easy way to push out updates for internal testers
  • 7
    In-App Updates
Pros
  • 23
    Python
  • 21
    Simple
  • 5
    Low learning curve, from bash script to Python power
  • 5
    Installation feedback for Twitter App Cards
  • 3
    Easy on maintainance
Integrations
Trigger.io
Trigger.io
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to TestFlight, Fabric?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

HockeyApp

HockeyApp

HockeyApp is the best way to collect live crash reports, get feedback from your users, distribute your betas, and analyze your test coverage.

TestFairy

TestFairy

When testing apps in the crowd, you never know what exactly was done, and what went wrong on the client side. TestFairy shows you a video of the exact test that was done, including CPU, memory, GPS, network and a lot more.

Beta by Crashlytics

Beta by Crashlytics

A streamlined solution for distributing apps that gives you a single, cross-platform toolset for iOS and Android, and a delightful, effortless onboarding for your testers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana