StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Experitest vs Fluent Assertions

Experitest vs Fluent Assertions

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Fluent Assertions
Fluent Assertions
Stacks16
Followers17
Votes0
Experitest
Experitest
Stacks8
Followers37
Votes0

Experitest vs Fluent Assertions: What are the differences?

Experitest: A provider of quality assurance tools for mobile DevOps. It allows users to create and run Appium, Selenium, XCUITest & Espresso tests against real devices and web browsers Users can create & execute hundreds of manual or automated tests in parallel on IOS & Android devices. Users can automate their cross-browser testing, perform visual testing and access advanced analytics.; Fluent Assertions: Library to build fluent assertions for unity testing. A very extensive set of extension methods that allow you to more naturally specify the expected outcome of a TDD or BDD-style unit tests. Targets .NET Framework 4.5 and 4.7, as well as .NET Core 2.0, .NET Core 3.0, .NET Standard 1.3, 1.6 and 2.0.

Experitest belongs to "Mobile Testing Frameworks" category of the tech stack, while Fluent Assertions can be primarily classified under "Testing Frameworks".

Some of the features offered by Experitest are:

  • Live mobile app testing
  • Automated mobile app testing
  • Live cross-browser testing

On the other hand, Fluent Assertions provides the following key features:

  • Intention-Revealing Unit Tests
  • Targets .NET 4.5, .NET 4.7, .NET Core 2.0, .NET Standard 1.3, 1.6 and 2.0 and is compatible .NET Core 3.0
  • Supports MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, Gallio, MBUnit, MSpec and NSpec.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Fluent Assertions
Fluent Assertions
Experitest
Experitest

A very extensive set of extension methods that allow you to more naturally specify the expected outcome of a TDD or BDD-style unit tests. Targets .NET Framework 4.5 and 4.7, as well as .NET Core 2.0, .NET Core 3.0, .NET Standard 1.3, 1.6 and 2.0.

It allows users to create and run Appium, Selenium, XCUITest & Espresso tests against real devices and web browsers. Users can create & execute hundreds of manual or automated tests in parallel on IOS & Android devices. Users can automate their cross-browser testing, perform visual testing and access advanced analytics.

Intention-Revealing Unit Tests; Targets .NET 4.5, .NET 4.7, .NET Core 2.0, .NET Standard 1.3, 1.6 and 2.0 and is compatible .NET Core 3.0; Supports MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, Gallio, MBUnit, MSpec and NSpec.
Live mobile app testing; Automated mobile app testing; Live cross-browser testing; Automated cross-browser testing; Visual testing; Global data centers; Test development; Open source compatibility; Large scale test execution; Integrations with CI tools; Integrations with development and testing tools
Statistics
Stacks
16
Stacks
8
Followers
17
Followers
37
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
.NET
.NET
NUnit
NUnit
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core
xUnit
xUnit
Bamboo
Bamboo
Java
Java
C#
C#
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
JavaScript
JavaScript
Jenkins X
Jenkins X
TestNG
TestNG
Ruby
Ruby
Eclipse
Eclipse
Selenium
Selenium

What are some alternatives to Fluent Assertions, Experitest?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Appium

Appium

Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana