Enzyme vs Zest

Overview

Enzyme

Stacks1.7K

Followers349

Votes0

Zest

Stacks8

Followers28

Votes0

GitHub Stars225

Forks13

Enzyme vs Zest: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Enzyme and Zest testing libraries.

1. **Testing Framework:** Enzyme is specifically designed to test React components by allowing shallow rendering, full DOM rendering, and static rendering of components, providing a variety of testing options. In contrast, Zest is a testing library that focuses on efficient and reliable UI testing for Angular applications, offering features tailored for Angular components and applications.
   
2. **API Compatibility:** Enzyme supports React component testing through its shallow, mount, and render APIs, providing a wide range of methods to interact with React components in tests. On the other hand, Zest offers APIs that are specifically optimized for Angular components, allowing testers to easily simulate user interactions and verify component behavior in Angular applications.
   
3. **Community Support:** Enzyme has a large and active community of developers, offering extensive documentation, forums, and resources for users to seek help and guidance while using the library. In comparison, Zest is supported by a dedicated community that focuses on Angular testing, providing specialized expertise and support for testers working with Angular applications.
   
4. **Integration with Testing Frameworks:** Enzyme seamlessly integrates with popular testing frameworks such as Jest and Mocha, allowing users to incorporate component testing into their existing testing workflows effortlessly. Conversely, Zest is designed to work cohesively with Angular testing utilities and tools, ensuring smooth integration with Angular testing frameworks like Karma and Protractor.
   
5. **Performance Optimization:** Enzyme emphasizes performance optimization by providing efficient testing utilities and features that help speed up test execution and improve overall testing efficiency for React applications. In contrast, Zest is tailored for Angular applications, offering performance-focused testing capabilities optimized for Angular components and UI elements.
   
6. **Focus on Component Interaction:** Enzyme places a strong emphasis on simulating component interactions and behaviors, allowing testers to thoroughly test React component functionality and user interactions in a controlled testing environment. In contrast, Zest is designed to streamline UI testing for Angular applications, providing tools and methods specifically tailored for testing Angular components' behavior and interactions.

In Summary, this Markdown code highlights key differences between Enzyme and Zest testing libraries, focusing on their testing frameworks, API compatibility, community support, integration with testing frameworks, performance optimization, and focus on component interaction.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Enzyme, Zest

Anonymous

Feb 6, 2020

Needs advice

Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.

290k views290k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Enzyme	Zest
Enzyme is a JavaScript Testing utility for React that makes it easier to assert, manipulate, and traverse your React Components' output.	Offline search tool for developers. Find what you need without Internet access.
Shallow rendering; Full DOM rendering; Static rendered markup; React Hooks support	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 225
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 13
Stacks 1.7K	Stacks 8
Followers 349	Followers 28
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
React	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Enzyme, Zest?

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Dash

Dash is an API Documentation Browser and Code Snippet Manager. Dash stores snippets of code and instantly searches offline documentation sets for 150+ APIs. You can even generate your own docsets or request docsets to be included.

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

QUnit

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Related Comparisons

Enzyme vs Zest: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Enzyme and Zest testing libraries.

1. **Testing Framework:** Enzyme is specifically designed to test React components by allowing shallow rendering, full DOM rendering, and static rendering of components, providing a variety of testing options. In contrast, Zest is a testing library that focuses on efficient and reliable UI testing for Angular applications, offering features tailored for Angular components and applications.
   
2. **API Compatibility:** Enzyme supports React component testing through its shallow, mount, and render APIs, providing a wide range of methods to interact with React components in tests. On the other hand, Zest offers APIs that are specifically optimized for Angular components, allowing testers to easily simulate user interactions and verify component behavior in Angular applications.
   
3. **Community Support:** Enzyme has a large and active community of developers, offering extensive documentation, forums, and resources for users to seek help and guidance while using the library. In comparison, Zest is supported by a dedicated community that focuses on Angular testing, providing specialized expertise and support for testers working with Angular applications.
   
4. **Integration with Testing Frameworks:** Enzyme seamlessly integrates with popular testing frameworks such as Jest and Mocha, allowing users to incorporate component testing into their existing testing workflows effortlessly. Conversely, Zest is designed to work cohesively with Angular testing utilities and tools, ensuring smooth integration with Angular testing frameworks like Karma and Protractor.
   
5. **Performance Optimization:** Enzyme emphasizes performance optimization by providing efficient testing utilities and features that help speed up test execution and improve overall testing efficiency for React applications. In contrast, Zest is tailored for Angular applications, offering performance-focused testing capabilities optimized for Angular components and UI elements.
   
6. **Focus on Component Interaction:** Enzyme places a strong emphasis on simulating component interactions and behaviors, allowing testers to thoroughly test React component functionality and user interactions in a controlled testing environment. In contrast, Zest is designed to streamline UI testing for Angular applications, providing tools and methods specifically tailored for testing Angular components' behavior and interactions.

Enzyme vs Zest

Overview