StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. Enzyme vs Mocha vs QUnit

Enzyme vs Mocha vs QUnit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mocha
Mocha
Stacks10.8K
Followers3.0K
Votes430
QUnit
QUnit
Stacks914
Followers82
Votes17
Enzyme
Enzyme
Stacks1.7K
Followers349
Votes0

Enzyme vs Mocha vs QUnit: What are the differences?

Introduction: When it comes to testing JavaScript applications, Enzyme, Mocha, and QUnit are popular testing tools used by developers. Each of these tools has its unique features and advantages that cater to different testing needs. Here, we will discuss the key differences between Enzyme, Mocha, and QUnit.

1. Compatibility with React Components: Enzyme is specifically designed for testing React components, offering a shallow rendering API to isolate and test components in isolation. On the other hand, Mocha and QUnit are more generic testing frameworks that can be used for testing a variety of JavaScript applications beyond just React.

2. Testing Style: Mocha and QUnit follow a more traditional testing style, where you write test suites and cases using functions like describe() and it(). Enzyme, on the other hand, encourages a more behavior-driven approach by providing APIs like shallow(), mount(), and render() to test how components behave.

3. DOM Manipulation: Although Mocha and QUnit both support DOM manipulation in tests, Enzyme provides a more intuitive and robust way to interact with components' DOM structure. This makes it easier to simulate user interactions and verify the rendered output more effectively.

4. APIs and Plugins: Mocha and QUnit offer a wide range of plugins and APIs for extending and customizing the testing framework to suit different project requirements. Enzyme, while not as extensible as Mocha or QUnit, provides a rich set of APIs specifically tailored for testing React components.

5. Asynchronous Testing: Both Mocha and QUnit have built-in support for handling asynchronous tests, using functions like done() or returning Promises. Enzyme, being a testing utility for React components, does not directly handle asynchronous testing but can be integrated with libraries like Jest for such scenarios.

6. Learning Curve: In terms of the learning curve, Mocha and QUnit are relatively easier to get started with due to their simple and straightforward APIs for writing tests. Enzyme, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve, especially for beginners, due to its React-specific testing methodologies and APIs.

In Summary, Enzyme is focused on testing React components with a behavior-driven approach, while Mocha and QUnit are more generic testing frameworks that offer broader testing capabilities and flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mocha
Mocha
QUnit
QUnit
Enzyme
Enzyme

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Enzyme is a JavaScript Testing utility for React that makes it easier to assert, manipulate, and traverse your React Components' output.

browser support;simple async support, including promises;test coverage reporting;string diff support;javascript API for running tests;proper exit status for CI support etc;auto-detects and disables coloring for non-ttys;maps uncaught exceptions to the correct test case;async test timeout support;test-specific timeouts;growl notification support;reports test durations;highlights slow tests;file watcher support;global variable leak detection
-
Shallow rendering; Full DOM rendering; Static rendered markup; React Hooks support
Statistics
Stacks
10.8K
Stacks
914
Stacks
1.7K
Followers
3.0K
Followers
82
Followers
349
Votes
430
Votes
17
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 137
    Open source
  • 102
    Simple
  • 81
    Promise support
  • 48
    Flexible
  • 29
    Easy to add support for Generators
Cons
  • 3
    Cannot test a promisified functions without assertion
  • 2
    No assertion count in results
  • 1
    Not as many reporter options as Jest
Pros
  • 6
    Simple
  • 4
    Open Source
  • 3
    Promise support
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Excellent GUI
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations availableNo integrations available
React
React

What are some alternatives to Mocha, QUnit, Enzyme?

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Protractor

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Sorry-cypress

Sorry-cypress

Open-source, self-hosted alternative Cypress Dashboard.

Baretest

Baretest

It is a fast and simple JavaScript test runner. It offers near-instant performance and a brainless API. It makes testing tolerable.

SinonJS

SinonJS

It is a really helpful library when you want to unit test your code. It supports spies, stubs, and mocks. The library has cross browser support and also can run on the server using Node.js.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana