StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. Enzyme vs jsdom

Enzyme vs jsdom

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Enzyme
Enzyme
Stacks1.7K
Followers349
Votes0
jsdom
jsdom
Stacks1.6K
Followers55
Votes1
GitHub Stars21.3K
Forks1.8K

Enzyme vs jsdom: What are the differences?

Introduction

Enzyme and jsdom are both popular tools used in JavaScript testing environments. However, they have key differences that developers should be aware of when deciding which tool to use.

  1. API Flexibility: Enzyme provides a more versatile API for interacting with React components, allowing developers to easily traverse the component tree and simulate user actions. On the other hand, jsdom focuses more on providing a realistic DOM environment for testing, without offering the same level of control over the component's lifecycle or internal state.

  2. Shallow Rendering vs. Full DOM: Enzyme's shallow rendering feature allows developers to render a component without its child components, increasing testing efficiency by focusing on the unit level. In contrast, jsdom offers a full DOM implementation, providing a more comprehensive testing environment that includes all child components and their interactions.

  3. Component Lifecycle Testing: Enzyme allows developers to access and test a component's lifecycle methods, such as componentDidMount or componentWillReceiveProps, facilitating in-depth testing of component behavior over time. Jsdom, being a pure DOM implementation, does not directly support testing React component lifecycles.

  4. Virtual DOM Handling: Enzyme leverages the virtual DOM implementation provided by React, enabling efficient updates and comparisons during testing to improve performance. Jsdom, while providing a realistic DOM environment, may not offer the same level of optimization as Enzyme when handling virtual DOM updates.

Summary

In summary, Enzyme offers more API flexibility, shallow rendering, component lifecycle testing capabilities, and optimized virtual DOM handling compared to jsdom, which focuses on providing a realistic DOM environment for testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Enzyme, jsdom

Anonymous
Anonymous

Feb 6, 2020

Needs advice

Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.

290k views290k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Enzyme
Enzyme
jsdom
jsdom

Enzyme is a JavaScript Testing utility for React that makes it easier to assert, manipulate, and traverse your React Components' output.

It is a pure-JavaScript implementation of many web standards, notably the WHATWG DOM and HTML Standards, for use with Node.js. In general, the goal of the project is to emulate enough of a subset of a web browser to be useful for testing and scraping real-world web applications.

Shallow rendering; Full DOM rendering; Static rendered markup; React Hooks support
Canvas support;Encoding sniffing;Closing down a jsdom;Running jsdom inside a web browser;Debugging the DOM using Chrome Devtools
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
21.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
Stacks
1.7K
Stacks
1.6K
Followers
349
Followers
55
Votes
0
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Lightweight
Integrations
React
React
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
Browserify
Browserify
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Enzyme, jsdom?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Protractor

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Puppeteer

Puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana