Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Enzyme

954
347
+ 1
0
Jest

9.2K
3.8K
+ 1
175
Protractor

1K
543
+ 1
33

Enzyme vs Jest vs Protractor: What are the differences?

  1. Testing Framework: Enzyme is mainly used for testing React components in isolation and shallow rendering, providing utilities to test React components' output. Jest, on the other hand, is a testing framework that includes an assertion library, mocking capabilities, and code coverage reports out of the box. Protractor is specifically designed for end-to-end testing of Angular applications, interacting with them as if a real user would.

  2. API: Enzyme's API is built around jQuery-like selectors and traversal functions, making it easier to assert on specific elements of a rendered component. Jest has a more integrated API, offering functions for test assertions, mocks, spies, and timers. Protractor, being a WebDriver-based tool, utilizes a Selenium-like API for accessing and interacting with web elements in Angular applications.

  3. Scope: Enzyme is best suited for unit and integration testing of React components, focusing on their isolated behavior and rendering. Jest is a comprehensive testing solution that covers unit testing, integration testing, and snapshot testing for React applications, providing a complete testing experience. Protractor, being an end-to-end testing framework, simulates user interactions across the entire application stack, covering frontend and backend interactions.

  4. Mocking: Enzyme provides utilities for shallow rendering components and manual mock implementations, allowing developers to isolate components for testing purposes. Jest has a built-in mocking system with functions for creating mocks, spies, and stubs, simplifying the process of mocking dependencies. Protractor also supports mocking HTTP requests and responses, enabling developers to simulate server responses during end-to-end tests.

  5. Performance: Enzyme's shallow rendering approach can lead to faster test execution times compared to full rendering, making it a preferred choice for quick component tests. Jest's built-in parallel test execution and smart test filtering mechanisms enhance test suite performance for large-scale applications. Protractor's asynchronous nature and WebDriver-based interactions may introduce some performance overhead, especially when dealing with complex interactions in Angular applications.

  6. Community Support: Enzyme and Jest are widely adopted within the React ecosystem, benefiting from a large community that contributes plugins, extensions, and best practices. Protractor, being specifically tailored for Angular applications, has dedicated support and resources within the Angular community, offering guidance and tools tailored to testing Angular features.

In Summary, Enzyme is focused on component testing, Jest provides a comprehensive testing solution with mocking capabilities, and Protractor specializes in end-to-end testing of Angular applications. Each tool serves specific testing needs within the JavaScript ecosystem.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Enzyme
Pros of Jest
Pros of Protractor
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 36
      Open source
    • 32
      Mock by default makes testing much simpler
    • 23
      Testing React Native Apps
    • 20
      Parallel test running
    • 16
      Fast
    • 13
      Bundled with JSDOM to enable DOM testing
    • 8
      Mock by default screws up your classes, breaking tests
    • 7
      Out of the box code coverage
    • 7
      Promise support
    • 6
      One stop shop for unit testing
    • 3
      Great documentation
    • 2
      Assert Library Included
    • 1
      Built in watch option with interactive filtering menu
    • 1
      Preset support
    • 0
      Can be used for BDD
    • 0
      Karma
    • 9
      Easy setup
    • 8
      Quick tests implementation
    • 6
      Flexible
    • 5
      Open source
    • 5
      Promise support

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Enzyme
    Cons of Jest
    Cons of Protractor
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 4
        Documentation
      • 4
        Ambiguous configuration
      • 3
        Difficult
      • 2
        Many bugs still not fixed months/years after reporting
      • 2
        Multiple error messages for same error
      • 2
        Difficult to run single test/describe/file
      • 2
        Ambiguous
      • 2
        Bugged
      • 1
        BeforeAll timing out makes all passing tests fail
      • 1
        Slow
      • 1
        Reporter is too general
      • 1
        Unstable
      • 1
        Bad docs
      • 1
        Still does't support .mjs files natively
      • 1
        Can't fail beforeAll to abort tests
      • 0
        Interaction with watch mode on terminal
      • 4
        Limited

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -
      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Enzyme?

      Enzyme is a JavaScript Testing utility for React that makes it easier to assert, manipulate, and traverse your React Components' output.

      What is Jest?

      Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

      What is Protractor?

      Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Enzyme?
      What companies use Jest?
      What companies use Protractor?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Enzyme?
      What tools integrate with Jest?
      What tools integrate with Protractor?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to Enzyme, Jest, and Protractor?
      react-testing-library
      It is a simple and complete React DOM testing utility that encourage good testing practices. It provides light utility functions on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, in a way that encourages better testing practices.
      Mocha
      Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.
      Chai
      It is a BDD / TDD assertion library for node and the browser that can be delightfully paired with any javascript testing framework. It has several interfaces that allow the developer to choose the most comfortable. The chain-capable BDD styles provide an expressive language & readable style, while the TDD assert style provides a more classical feel.
      Jasmine
      Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.
      Cypress
      Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
      See all alternatives