Duo vs MobileIron

Overview

Duo

Stacks24

Followers43

Votes1

GitHub Stars3.4K

Forks115

MobileIron

Stacks1

Followers11

Votes0

Duo vs MobileIron: What are the differences?

Authentication Methods: Duo offers a variety of authentication methods such as push notifications, phone call verification, SMS passcodes, and biometric authentication, while MobileIron relies mainly on traditional methods like username and password, with limited support for additional methods.
Mobile Device Management Features: MobileIron provides advanced mobile device management capabilities like remote wipe, app distribution, and device configuration, whereas Duo focuses more on authentication and access control, with fewer device management features.
Deployment Flexibility: Duo can be easily integrated with a wide range of applications and services through its extensive APIs and SDKs, enabling seamless deployment in diverse environments. In contrast, MobileIron is more focused on managing mobile devices within an enterprise ecosystem, with less flexibility for integration with other systems.
Target Users: MobileIron caters primarily to enterprises and large organizations looking for comprehensive mobile device management solutions, whereas Duo is popular among businesses of all sizes seeking secure and user-friendly authentication solutions.
Cost Structure: Duo offers a simple and transparent pricing model based on the number of users, making it easy for businesses to budget and scale their authentication needs. On the other hand, MobileIron's pricing is more complex, involving various factors like the number of devices, users, and additional features, which can make cost calculations more challenging for organizations.
Security Focus: Duo places a strong emphasis on security, with features like adaptive authentication and fraud prevention, prioritizing the protection of user identities and data. While MobileIron also prioritizes security, its focus is more on device management and compliance, with fewer advanced security features compared to Duo.

In Summary, Duo and MobileIron differ in authentication methods, mobile device management features, deployment flexibility, target users, cost structure, and security focus.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Duo	MobileIron
Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless.	It is redefining enterprise security with the industry’s first mobile-centric, zero trust platform built on the foundation of unified endpoint management (UEM) to secure access and protect data across the perimeter-less enterprise.
has first-class support for Javascript, HTML and CSS;exposes a unix-y command line interface;pulls source directly from GitHub with semantic versioning;supports source transforms, like Coffeescript or Sass;does not require a manifest	Mobile-centric; Zero trust platform ; Unified Endpoint Management
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 115	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 24	Stacks 1
Followers 43	Followers 11
Votes 1	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Lean and efficient	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Duo, MobileIron?

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Verdaccio

A simple, zero-config-required local private npm registry. Comes out of the box with its own tiny database, and the ability to proxy other registries (eg. npmjs.org), caching the downloaded modules along the way.

pip

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

Pika.dev

It is a new kind of package registry for the modern web. It handles formatting, configuring, building and publishing every package on the registry, so that individual authors don't have to.

DeviceLab

Build your own distributed mobile device lab. Test on real iOS and Android devices you own. P2P architecture—data never leaves your network.

HCL BigFix

HCL BigFix is the platform for unified endpoint and infrastructure management, purpose-built to deliver on the Digital+ promise of reducing cost, risk, and complexity. Proven at enterprise scale, BigFix secures and manages 155M+ endpoints across nearly 100 operating systems. It leverages AI-driven automation to deliver continuous compliance and real-time vulnerability remediation with one of the industry’s best first-pass patch success rates (>98%). This is enhanced by AEX, our agentic AI platform, which transforms the digital employee experience through proactive, self-healing support. HCL BigFix is the single solution to secure any endpoint, in any cloud, across any industry.

Related Comparisons

Duo vs MobileIron: What are the differences?

Authentication Methods: Duo offers a variety of authentication methods such as push notifications, phone call verification, SMS passcodes, and biometric authentication, while MobileIron relies mainly on traditional methods like username and password, with limited support for additional methods.
Mobile Device Management Features: MobileIron provides advanced mobile device management capabilities like remote wipe, app distribution, and device configuration, whereas Duo focuses more on authentication and access control, with fewer device management features.
Deployment Flexibility: Duo can be easily integrated with a wide range of applications and services through its extensive APIs and SDKs, enabling seamless deployment in diverse environments. In contrast, MobileIron is more focused on managing mobile devices within an enterprise ecosystem, with less flexibility for integration with other systems.
Target Users: MobileIron caters primarily to enterprises and large organizations looking for comprehensive mobile device management solutions, whereas Duo is popular among businesses of all sizes seeking secure and user-friendly authentication solutions.
Cost Structure: Duo offers a simple and transparent pricing model based on the number of users, making it easy for businesses to budget and scale their authentication needs. On the other hand, MobileIron's pricing is more complex, involving various factors like the number of devices, users, and additional features, which can make cost calculations more challenging for organizations.
Security Focus: Duo places a strong emphasis on security, with features like adaptive authentication and fraud prevention, prioritizing the protection of user identities and data. While MobileIron also prioritizes security, its focus is more on device management and compliance, with fewer advanced security features compared to Duo.

In Summary, Duo and MobileIron differ in authentication methods, mobile device management features, deployment flexibility, target users, cost structure, and security focus.

Duo vs MobileIron

Overview