Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Docker

171.4K
137.7K
+ 1
3.9K
OpenStack

779
1.1K
+ 1
130
Add tool

Docker vs OpenStack: What are the differences?

Introduction

Docker and OpenStack are both widely used technologies in the field of cloud computing. While they both serve the purpose of managing cloud infrastructure, there are some key differences between them.

  1. Architecture: Docker follows a lightweight containerization approach, where applications and their dependencies are packaged into individual containers. These containers run on a single host operating system, sharing the same kernel. On the other hand, OpenStack is a full-fledged cloud computing platform that provides a range of services including compute, storage, and networking. It follows a modular architecture and utilizes virtual machines for isolation.

  2. Scalability: Docker is known for its scalability as it allows easy scaling of individual containers. With the use of container orchestration tools like Kubernetes, multiple containers can be managed and scaled horizontally. OpenStack, on the other hand, is designed for managing large-scale cloud deployments. It provides scalability at a higher level, enabling the management of a cluster of servers.

  3. Resource utilization: Docker containers are lightweight and have low overhead, thus allowing efficient utilization of system resources. Multiple containers can run on the same host without significant impact on performance. OpenStack, being a comprehensive cloud solution, requires more resources to run as it manages virtual machines and provides various services. This may result in higher resource consumption compared to Docker.

  4. Purpose: Docker is primarily used for application deployment and management. It focuses on providing a consistent environment for running applications across different platforms. OpenStack, on the other hand, is more suited for building and managing cloud infrastructure. It offers a range of services that cater to the needs of a cloud environment, including compute, storage, and networking.

  5. Use cases: Docker is commonly used in scenarios where rapid application deployment and scalability are critical, such as microservices architecture and DevOps practices. It allows developers to package applications with their dependencies, enabling easy distribution and deployment. OpenStack, on the other hand, is well-suited for creating private or public clouds. It is often used by service providers, enterprises, and research organizations for managing cloud infrastructure.

  6. Community and ecosystem: Docker has a vast and active community, with a large number of available images, libraries, and tools. It has gained significant popularity and has a wide range of integrations with various platforms and services. OpenStack also has a well-established community, and it is backed by numerous companies and organizations. It has a comprehensive ecosystem of projects and plugins that extend its functionality.

In summary, Docker focuses on lightweight containerization and application management, while OpenStack provides a full-stack cloud computing platform with a range of services. Docker is more suitable for rapid application deployment and scalability, while OpenStack is designed for larger-scale cloud infrastructure management.

Decisions about Docker and OpenStack
Florian Sager
IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH · | 3 upvotes · 429.2K views
Chose
LXDLXD
over
DockerDocker

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Docker
Pros of OpenStack
  • 823
    Rapid integration and build up
  • 691
    Isolation
  • 521
    Open source
  • 505
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 460
    Lightweight
  • 218
    Standardization
  • 185
    Scalable
  • 106
    Upgrading / down­grad­ing / ap­pli­ca­tion versions
  • 88
    Security
  • 85
    Private paas environments
  • 34
    Portability
  • 26
    Limit resource usage
  • 17
    Game changer
  • 16
    I love the way docker has changed virtualization
  • 14
    Fast
  • 12
    Concurrency
  • 8
    Docker's Compose tools
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 6
    Fast and Portable
  • 5
    Because its fun
  • 4
    Makes shipping to production very simple
  • 3
    Highly useful
  • 3
    It's dope
  • 2
    Very easy to setup integrate and build
  • 2
    HIgh Throughput
  • 2
    Package the environment with the application
  • 2
    Does a nice job hogging memory
  • 2
    Open source and highly configurable
  • 2
    Simplicity, isolation, resource effective
  • 2
    MacOS support FAKE
  • 2
    Its cool
  • 2
    Docker hub for the FTW
  • 2
    Super
  • 0
    Asdfd
  • 56
    Private cloud
  • 38
    Avoid vendor lock-in
  • 22
    Flexible in use
  • 6
    Industry leader
  • 4
    Supported by many companies in top500
  • 4
    Robust architecture

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Docker
Cons of OpenStack
  • 8
    New versions == broken features
  • 6
    Unreliable networking
  • 6
    Documentation not always in sync
  • 4
    Moves quickly
  • 3
    Not Secure
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Docker?

    The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

    What is OpenStack?

    OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Docker?
    What companies use OpenStack?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Docker or OpenStack.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Docker?
    What tools integrate with OpenStack?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    PythonDockerKubernetes+7
    3
    1110
    PythonDockerKubernetes+14
    12
    2615
    Jul 9 2019 at 7:22PM

    Blue Medora

    DockerPostgreSQLNew Relic+8
    11
    2345
    DockerAmazon EC2Scala+8
    6
    2721
    GitHubDockerReact+17
    41
    36576
    What are some alternatives to Docker and OpenStack?
    LXC
    LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.
    rkt
    Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
    Cloud Foundry
    Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.
    Vagrant
    Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.
    See all alternatives