Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs minikube: What are the differences?
Docker vs Minikube
Docker and Minikube are both popular technologies used in containerization and orchestration of applications. Although they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between them:
Architecture: Docker is a containerization platform that allows applications to run in isolated environments called containers. It uses a client-server architecture where the Docker daemon manages the containers. In contrast, Minikube is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution that allows the deployment and management of Kubernetes clusters. It runs a single-node Kubernetes cluster inside a virtual machine.
Scope: Docker focuses on containerization at the application level, allowing developers to package and distribute applications along with their dependencies. On the other hand, Minikube extends Docker's capabilities by providing a local Kubernetes environment for development and testing purposes, allowing the deployment and orchestration of multiple containers in a cluster.
Portability: Docker containers can be easily shared and run on any system that has Docker installed, providing high portability and consistency across different environments. In contrast, Minikube focuses on providing a local development environment and is not typically used for production deployments. Kubernetes clusters created with Minikube are not easily transferable to other environments.
Scalability: Docker containers can be scaled horizontally by running multiple instances of the same container across different hosts. However, Docker does not provide built-in orchestration capabilities for scaling containers. On the other hand, Minikube leverages the power of Kubernetes to provide advanced container orchestration features, including scaling, load balancing, and self-healing for applications running in a cluster.
Networking: Docker uses its own networking model, allowing containers to communicate with each other using internal IP addresses. This makes it easy to link containers within the same Docker host. In contrast, Minikube leverages Kubernetes networking concepts and provides a cluster-level network, allowing containers to communicate with each other across different hosts in the cluster.
Application Deployment: Docker provides a simple and straightforward way to package and deploy applications using Docker images. Developers can define the application's dependencies, configurations, and runtime environment within the Docker image. On the other hand, Minikube uses Kubernetes manifests to define the desired state of the application, including the number of replicas, resource requirements, and networking configurations. Kubernetes then takes care of orchestrating the deployment based on these manifests.
In summary, Docker is primarily focused on containerization at the application level, providing portability and isolation, while Minikube extends Docker's capabilities by offering a local Kubernetes environment for development and testing, providing advanced container orchestration features.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Easy setup6
- Fast and Portable6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- Highly useful3
- It's dope3
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Asdfd0
Pros of minikube
- Let's me test k8s config locally1
- Can use same yaml config I'll use for prod deployment1
- Easy setup1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3