Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs k3s: What are the differences?
Introduction
Docker and k3s are both containerization platforms that allow developers to build, deploy, and manage applications within containers. While they have some similarities, there are key differences between the two.
Architecture: Docker is a full-fledged containerization platform that comprises a daemon, client, and container runtime. It is designed to be easily installed and run on various operating systems. On the other hand, k3s is a lightweight and certified Kubernetes distribution that is optimized for resource-constrained environments. It is specifically designed for edge computing, IoT, and other low-resource scenarios.
Resource Footprint: Docker has a heavier resource footprint compared to k3s. Docker runs its own virtualization layer and requires a dedicated kernel. In contrast, k3s leverages the lightweight container orchestration capabilities of Kubernetes, making it more efficient and consuming fewer resources.
Ease of Installation: Docker is relatively easy to install and setup, especially on individual machines or development environments. It provides a user-friendly interface and documentation. Conversely, k3s is designed for simplicity and ease of deployment in resource-constrained environments. It requires fewer system dependencies and can be installed with a single command.
Management and Features: Docker provides a robust set of management tools and features that enable developers to build, test, and deploy applications seamlessly. It supports container networking, storage management, and image registry. Meanwhile, k3s extends the functionality of Kubernetes by providing a lightweight and simplified Kubernetes distribution, ensuring compatibility while optimizing resource usage.
Community Support: Docker benefits from a large and active community, resulting in a vast ecosystem of plugins, tools, and resources. It has been widely adopted in the industry, and developers can find extensive documentation and community support. While k3s is a relatively newer project, it is gaining popularity and has an active community contributing to its development.
Use Case Focus: Docker focuses on enabling developers to package and distribute applications as containers, regardless of the underlying infrastructure. It is useful for development teams working on various platforms. Conversely, k3s specifically targets resource-constrained environments, edge computing, and IoT use cases. It is designed to be lightweight and efficient, enabling Kubernetes to run on low-resource devices.
In Summary, Docker is a full-fledged containerization platform with a larger ecosystem and focus on enabling containerized application development, while k3s is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution optimized for resource-constrained environments such as edge computing and IoT.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Fast and Portable6
- Easy setup6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- It's dope3
- Highly useful3
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Asdfd0
Pros of k3s
- Lightweight6
- Easy4
- Replication Controller2
- Scale Services2
- Open Source2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3