Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs Docker Machine: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Docker and Docker Machine.
Installation and Setup: Docker can be installed directly on a host operating system and is used for managing containers. On the other hand, Docker Machine is a separate tool that helps in the installation, configuration, and management of Docker on remote hosts or virtual machines.
Multiple Host Management: Docker can only manage containers on the local host, while Docker Machine can manage containers on multiple remote hosts or virtual machines. This allows for easy scaling and distribution of containerized applications across different environments.
Provisioning and Management of Hosts: Docker Machine automates the process of provisioning and managing hosts by creating and configuring virtual machines on various cloud providers or local hypervisors. Docker, on the other hand, focuses on container orchestration and management rather than host provisioning.
Platform Support: Docker is available for a wide variety of operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows. Docker Machine, however, has limited support and may not work seamlessly on all operating systems.
Remote SSH Access: Docker Machine provides a convenient way to SSH into remote hosts and manage containers on them. Docker, on the other hand, does not offer this feature natively and requires additional configuration to access containers on remote hosts.
Integration with Other Tools: Docker Machine integrates well with other tools in the Docker ecosystem, such as Docker Compose and Docker Swarm, allowing for easy management of multi-host container deployments. Docker, on the other hand, focuses on container management and orchestration within a single host environment.
In summary, Docker is primarily focused on local container management, while Docker Machine extends this functionality by enabling management of containers on remote hosts or virtual machines. Docker Machine also automates the process of provisioning and managing hosts, making it easier to scale and distribute containerized applications.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Fast and Portable6
- Easy setup6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- It's dope3
- Highly useful3
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Asdfd0
Pros of Docker Machine
- Easy docker hosts management12
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3