Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs Docker Compose: What are the differences?
Introduction
Docker and Docker Compose are powerful tools used in the field of containerization. While they both serve different purposes within the containerization ecosystem, they are often used together to optimize the management and deployment of applications. This Markdown code will provide a concise comparison of the key differences between Docker and Docker Compose.
Orchestration Capabilities: Docker is primarily used for creating, packaging, and running individual containers. It focuses on containerization at the single-container level. On the other hand, Docker Compose is designed for multi-container applications and provides orchestration capabilities, allowing users to define and manage multiple containers as a single entity.
Configuration Options: Docker uses Dockerfiles to define container configurations. These Dockerfiles comprise instructions that build, configure, and run containers. Docker Compose, on the other hand, uses a declarative YAML file that allows users to define and manage multi-container applications using a higher-level syntax. This approach simplifies the management of complex application configurations.
Scalability: Docker allows users to scale containers independently. With Docker Compose, scaling multiple containers can be achieved, but it has limitations compared to more sophisticated orchestration tools like Docker Swarm or Kubernetes. Docker Swarm provides built-in scaling capabilities and handles service discovery and load balancing, making it suitable for scaling large-scale applications.
Service Discovery: Docker has a built-in DNS service discovery mechanism, which allows containers to communicate with each other using container names. Docker Compose leverages this service discovery mechanism, but it also provides user-defined networks that facilitate container communication and make it easier to manage complex inter-container dependencies.
Environment Variables: Docker allows users to define environment variables at the container level using the
-e
flag while running containers. Docker Compose extends this functionality by allowing users to define environment variables within the Compose file itself. These variables can be used to configure container-specific settings or to pass dynamic values to containers during runtime.Ease of Use and Portability: Docker Compose simplifies the deployment process by allowing users to define a complete application stack with a single command. This makes it easy to share and replicate application environments across different systems. Docker, on the other hand, provides more flexibility but requires users to manage containers individually, making it less portable.
In Summary, Docker is focused on containerization at the single-container level, while Docker Compose is designed for managing multi-container applications and provides orchestration capabilities. Docker Compose simplifies the process of defining and managing multi-container applications, making it more suitable for complex deployments.
GitHub
is used for version control as it is a standard. GitHub is also chosen due to familiarity and additional features, such as projects, milestones, and issues.
Docker
's Docker Compose
is used to containerize the application, for making it easy to set up developer environments.
Google Analytics
is used for tracking, especially due to the fact that it is integrated with Firebase
as they are both Google products.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Fast and Portable6
- Easy setup6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- It's dope3
- Highly useful3
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Asdfd0
Pros of Docker Compose
- Multi-container descriptor123
- Fast development environment setup110
- Easy linking of containers79
- Simple yaml configuration68
- Easy setup60
- Yml or yaml format16
- Use Standard Docker API12
- Open source8
- Go from template to application in minutes5
- Can choose Discovery Backend5
- Scalable4
- Easy configuration4
- Kubernetes integration4
- Quick and easy3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3
Cons of Docker Compose
- Tied to single machine9
- Still very volatile, changing syntax often5