StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Docker Compose vs Testcontainers

Docker Compose vs Testcontainers

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K
Testcontainers
Testcontainers
Stacks139
Followers59
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.5K
Forks1.8K

Docker Compose vs Testcontainers: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Docker Compose and Testcontainers. Both Docker Compose and Testcontainers are tools used in the software development process, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features.

  1. Flexibility and Complexity: Docker Compose is a tool that enables the management of multi-container applications. It allows developers to define and run multiple containers in a single environment. Docker Compose provides a declarative syntax for defining services, networks, and volumes, making it easier to manage complex applications with multiple interconnected components. On the other hand, Testcontainers is a Java library that provides lightweight, disposable Docker containers for integration testing. It simplifies the process of setting up and tearing down test dependencies, making it an ideal choice for integration testing in a controlled environment.

  2. Dependencies Management: Docker Compose excels in managing dependencies between different application components, allowing developers to define the relationships, networks, and volumes required for the proper functioning of the application. It provides a way to define and control the network connections and data volumes shared between containers. Testcontainers, on the other hand, focuses on managing dependencies specifically for testing purposes. It allows developers to define the required containers and network connections, specifically tailored for integration testing.

  3. Development Environment vs Testing Environment: Docker Compose is primarily used for managing multi-container applications in development and production environments. It provides a complete environment where different components of an application can interact with each other. Developers can use Docker Compose to create an environment that closely resembles the production environment. Testcontainers, on the other hand, is specifically designed for testing purposes. It allows developers to easily create and manage lightweight Docker containers for integration testing, ensuring that tests run in an isolated and controlled environment.

  4. Ease of Use: Docker Compose requires a good understanding of Docker and its concepts. Developers need to learn the syntax and configuration options to define services, networks, and volumes. Testcontainers, on the other hand, provides a simple and intuitive API that abstracts the complexities of Docker. It offers a fluent interface for defining the required containers and makes it easy to start, stop, and manage containers during the testing process.

  5. Portability: Docker Compose configurations can be shared and used across different environments, allowing developers to define their application's infrastructure as code. It facilitates easy deployment and scaling of applications. Testcontainers, however, is primarily focused on integration testing and provides a more lightweight and portable solution. Since Testcontainers manages the containers specifically for testing purposes, it offers better portability and isolation for integration tests.

  6. Integration with Testing Frameworks: Testcontainers seamlessly integrates with popular testing frameworks such as JUnit, TestNG, and Spock. It provides convenient annotations and rules that can be used to start and stop containers automatically before and after tests. Docker Compose, on the other hand, requires additional setup and configuration to integrate with testing frameworks, as it is primarily focused on managing applications rather than testing.

In summary, Docker Compose is a tool for managing multi-container applications in development and production environments, while Testcontainers is a Java library that provides lightweight Docker containers for integration testing. Docker Compose focuses on managing dependencies and interconnections between different components, whereas Testcontainers provides an easy-to-use testing framework specifically designed for integration testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Testcontainers
Testcontainers

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

It is a Java library that supports JUnit tests, providing lightweight, throwaway instances of common databases, Selenium web browsers, or anything else that can run in a Docker container.

-
Data access layer integration tests; Application integration tests; UI/Acceptance tests
Statistics
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Stars
8.5K
GitHub Forks
5.5K
GitHub Forks
1.8K
Stacks
22.3K
Stacks
139
Followers
16.5K
Followers
59
Votes
501
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Oracle
Oracle
Docker
Docker
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
Spock Framework
Spock Framework
JUnit
JUnit

What are some alternatives to Docker Compose, Testcontainers?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana