StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Open Source Cloud
  5. Docker Compose vs OpenStack

Docker Compose vs OpenStack

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenStack
OpenStack
Stacks790
Followers1.2K
Votes138
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K

Docker Compose vs OpenStack: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown code provides a comparison between Docker Compose and OpenStack, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Scalability: Docker Compose is designed for small-scale deployments, making it suitable for local development environments and small projects. On the other hand, OpenStack is built for large-scale deployments, offering robust scalability options to handle enterprise-level workloads.

  2. Orchestration Capabilities: Docker Compose focuses on orchestrating containers on a single host machine, providing basic management and coordination features. However, OpenStack offers advanced orchestration capabilities through its components like Heat, enabling the deployment and management of complex multi-tier applications across multiple hosts.

  3. Containerization Scope: Docker Compose is primarily used for containerization at the application level. It allows developers to define the services, networks, and volumes required by their application. Meanwhile, OpenStack provides infrastructure-level containerization, allowing users to manage and orchestrate containers as virtual machines or bare-metal instances.

  4. Resource Management: Docker Compose does not offer built-in resource management capabilities. It relies on the host machine's resources and sharing policies among containers. In contrast, OpenStack provides resource management at a granular level, allowing users to define resource quotas, limits, and allocation policies for different projects or tenants.

  5. Networking: Docker Compose uses default networking options, such as NAT and bridge networks, making it simple to connect containers on the same host. However, OpenStack offers more advanced networking features, including software-defined networking (SDN), floating IPs, and load balancers, enabling more complex network configurations and connectivity across multiple hosts.

  6. Heterogeneous Environment Support: Docker Compose is primarily aimed at Linux-based environments and lacks official support for other operating systems. Conversely, OpenStack is designed to support multi-platform environments, including Linux, Windows, and several hypervisors, providing more flexibility in terms of hardware and software compatibility.

In summary, Docker Compose is suitable for small-scale containerization of applications on a single host, while OpenStack offers robust scalability, advanced orchestration capabilities, resource management, extensive networking features, support for heterogeneous environments, and infrastructure-level containerization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenStack
OpenStack
Docker Compose
Docker Compose

OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Compute;Storage;Networking;Dashboard;Shared Services
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.5K
Stacks
790
Stacks
22.3K
Followers
1.2K
Followers
16.5K
Votes
138
Votes
501
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Private cloud
  • 39
    Avoid vendor lock-in
  • 23
    Flexible in use
  • 7
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Robust architecture
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to OpenStack, Docker Compose?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Apache CloudStack

Apache CloudStack

CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana