StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Docker Compose vs LXC

Docker Compose vs LXC

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K
LXC
LXC
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes19
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks1.2K

Docker Compose vs LXC: What are the differences?

Introduction

Docker Compose and LXC are containerization technologies used in the deployment and management of applications. While they both serve similar purposes, they have key differences that distinguish them from each other.

  1. Storage Utilization: Docker Compose primarily focuses on efficient storage utilization through the use of shared layers. It uses a layered file system that allows different instances of a container to share common layers, reducing disk space usage. On the other hand, LXC uses full system containers that require more storage space as each container has its own complete file system.

  2. Dependency Management: Docker Compose provides an easy way to define and manage dependencies between different containers using a declarative YAML file. It allows users to specify dependencies and their versions, ensuring that all required services are initialized in the correct order. LXC, on the other hand, does not have built-in dependency management capabilities and relies on manual configuration.

  3. Isolation Level: Docker Compose uses operating system-level virtualization to provide application-level isolation. It achieves this by leveraging Linux kernel features such as namespaces and cgroups. LXC, on the other hand, provides full system isolation where each container has its own complete operating system stack.

  4. Ease of Use: Docker Compose is designed to be user-friendly and provides a higher level of abstraction compared to LXC. Its declarative syntax and extensive ecosystem make it easier to manage containers, define networks, and configure services. LXC, being a lower-level tool, requires more manual configuration and has a steeper learning curve.

  5. Portability: Docker Compose is known for its portability across different operating systems and environments. It allows users to define a consistent configuration file that can be used to run containers in different environments without modification. LXC, on the other hand, might face compatibility issues when moving containers across various environments due to differences in underlying configurations.

  6. Community Support: Docker Compose benefits from a large community of users and contributors, resulting in extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party tools. The active community ensures regular updates, bug fixes, and new features. In contrast, LXC has a smaller community and may have limited resources and documentation available.

In summary, Docker Compose offers efficient storage utilization, dependency management, application-level isolation, ease of use, portability, and strong community support. LXC, on the other hand, provides full system isolation, requires more manual configuration, and may have limitations in terms of portability and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
LXC
LXC

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Forks
5.5K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
22.3K
Stacks
116
Followers
16.5K
Followers
223
Votes
501
Votes
19
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Pros
  • 5
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Lightweight
  • 3
    Simple and powerful
  • 3
    Good security
  • 2
    LGPL
Integrations
Docker
Docker
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Docker Compose, LXC?

Docker

Docker

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

LXD

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana