StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Docker Cloud vs GitLab

Docker Cloud vs GitLab

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Docker Cloud
Docker Cloud
Stacks78
Followers127
Votes11

Docker Cloud vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Docker Cloud and GitLab in relation to their functionalities and features.

  1. Scalability and Flexibility: Docker Cloud primarily focuses on providing a platform for container orchestration and management. It offers seamless integration with widely used containerization platform Docker, enabling developers to easily scale applications across multiple hosts with the help of its automatic load balancing and scheduling capabilities. On the other hand, GitLab is a comprehensive DevOps platform that not only supports containerization but also offers a wide range of integrated tools for source code management, continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD), and more. It provides a flexible and modular approach to handle the entire software development lifecycle.

  2. Built-in Integrations: Docker Cloud provides built-in support and integration with popular cloud providers such as AWS and Azure, allowing users to easily deploy and manage their containers on these platforms. It also offers seamless integration with Docker Hub, simplifying the process of pulling and building container images. In contrast, GitLab offers a broad range of built-in integrations with various external services and tools, including popular cloud providers, Kubernetes, Prometheus, and many more. This extensive integration capability makes GitLab a comprehensive platform that can cater to a wide range of deployment and monitoring requirements.

  3. Container Registry: Docker Cloud includes a private Docker image registry, enabling users to store and distribute their container images securely. It provides an easy-to-use UI for managing images, allowing developers to push, pull, and delete images effortlessly. In contrast, GitLab also includes a built-in container registry that not only supports Docker images but also other container formats such as OCI images. This registry is tightly integrated with GitLab's version control system, enabling developers to seamlessly store, manage, and version their container images as part of their source code repository.

  4. CI/CD Automation: Docker Cloud does not have built-in CI/CD capabilities and mainly focuses on container orchestration and management tasks. On the other hand, GitLab offers robust CI/CD capabilities as a core part of its platform. It provides a powerful CI/CD pipeline configuration and management system that allows users to define and automate the entire application build, test, and deployment process. This capability eliminates the need for external CI/CD tools and streamlines the development and deployment workflow.

  5. Collaboration and Code Review: GitLab has strong collaboration and code review features built into its platform. It allows multiple developers to collaborate on code through merge requests, enabling them to review, comment, and suggest changes to each other's code. GitLab also provides features like inline code commenting, code snippets, and code comparison tools, facilitating efficient code collaboration and review. Docker Cloud, on the other hand, does not have dedicated collaboration and code review features, as it primarily focuses on container management and deployment tasks.

  6. Pricing and Availability: Docker Cloud has a pricing model based on the number of nodes and the level of support required. It offers a free tier with limited features and capacity. However, Docker Cloud has announced its end-of-life and will be discontinued after May 21st, 2021. GitLab, on the other hand, offers both a self-hosted version (Community Edition) and a cloud-hosted version (GitLab.com). The Community Edition is free and open-source, while the cloud-hosted version provides various pricing plans based on the desired features, storage, and number of users.

In summary, while Docker Cloud primarily focuses on container orchestration and provides seamless integration with the Docker ecosystem, GitLab offers a comprehensive DevOps platform with a wide range of integrated tools, extensive built-in integrations, and robust CI/CD capabilities. GitLab also excels in collaboration and code review features, while Docker Cloud emphasizes container management and deployment. Also, considering Docker Cloud's end-of-life status, GitLab provides a more sustainable and long-term solution for organizations' DevOps needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, Docker Cloud

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
Docker Cloud
Docker Cloud

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Docker Cloud is the best way to deploy and manage Dockerized applications. Docker Cloud makes it easy for new Docker users to manage and deploy the full spectrum of applications, from single container apps to distributed microservices stacks, to any cloud or on-premises infrastructure.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Simplify Docker Provisioning;Deploy Apps Anywhere;Automate Your Developer Workflows;Manage Apps Anywhere
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
78
Followers
54.5K
Followers
127
Votes
2.5K
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 9
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Seamless transition from docker compose
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Docker Cloud?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Google Kubernetes Engine

Google Kubernetes Engine

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana