StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Data Security Services
  5. Digital Guardian vs Forcepoint

Digital Guardian vs Forcepoint

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Digital Guardian
Digital Guardian
Stacks3
Followers6
Votes0
Forcepoint
Forcepoint
Stacks8
Followers13
Votes0

Digital Guardian vs Forcepoint: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between Digital Guardian and Forcepoint

Digital Guardian and Forcepoint are both prominent players in the cybersecurity industry, offering a range of solutions to protect organizations against data breaches and insider threats. Below are some key differences that set them apart:

1. **Focus on Data Protection**: Digital Guardian is known for its primary focus on data protection, offering solutions that help organizations discover, classify, and monitor sensitive data to prevent unauthorized access and leakage. On the other hand, Forcepoint provides a broader range of cybersecurity solutions, including data loss prevention, web filtering, and secure email gateways.

2. **User Behavior Analytics**: Digital Guardian puts a strong emphasis on user behavior analytics to detect and prevent insider threats, leveraging machine learning algorithms to identify abnormal user activities that may indicate a potential data breach. In comparison, Forcepoint also utilizes behavioral analytics but integrates additional tools for threat intelligence and network security.

3. **Cloud Security Capabilities**: When it comes to cloud security, Digital Guardian offers robust integration with cloud platforms like Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure to secure data stored in the cloud. Forcepoint, on the other hand, provides comprehensive cloud security solutions, combining data protection, web security, and cloud access security broker (CASB) capabilities.

4. **Global Presence and Compliance Support**: Forcepoint has a more extensive global presence and supports compliance with regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS across various industries. Digital Guardian, while also catering to compliance requirements, may have a more focused approach in certain sectors like healthcare and financial services.

5. **Endpoint Security Features**: Digital Guardian specializes in endpoint security, offering advanced capabilities for securing endpoints and preventing data loss through removable devices, printers, and network shares. In contrast, Forcepoint includes endpoint security features as part of its broader cybersecurity suite, emphasizing integration with network security and threat intelligence.

6. **Deployment Flexibility**: Digital Guardian typically provides on-premises and cloud deployment options to suit diverse organizational needs, while Forcepoint offers a wider range of deployment options, including hybrid deployment models that combine on-premises and cloud solutions to meet specific security requirements.

In Summary, Digital Guardian and Forcepoint differentiate themselves through their focus on data protection, user behavior analytics, cloud security, global compliance support, endpoint security features, and deployment flexibility in the cybersecurity landscape. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Digital Guardian
Digital Guardian
Forcepoint
Forcepoint

Your organization relies on sensitive data, you need no-compromise data protection. Cloud-delivered for reduced complexity, cross platform coverage for zero gaps, and flexible controls to align with your risk profile.

It develops and markets cybersecurity software to prevent employees from viewing inappropriate or malicious content, or leaking confidential data. It also sells firewall, cloud access, and cross-domain IT security products.

Detect and respond to threats faster and more efficiently, regardless of the threat, with big data cloud services powered by AWS; Delivers the deepest visibility and control available on the market across Windows, macOS, and Linux. Capabilities range from logging to blocking threats to your data; Supports compliance by protecting data at rest and data in motion with low overhead using Database Record Matching fingerprinting technology; Enables setting up your platform, including configuring and deploying agents. Create and manage policies, alerts, and reports
User Protection; Behavioral Analytics; Insider Threat; Dynamic Data Protection; Email Security
Statistics
Stacks
3
Stacks
8
Followers
6
Followers
13
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Digital Guardian, Forcepoint?

AWS Key Management Service

AWS Key Management Service

AWS Key Management Service (KMS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to create and control the encryption keys used to encrypt your data, and uses Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) to protect the security of your keys. AWS Key Management Service is integrated with other AWS services including Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, and Amazon Redshift. AWS Key Management Service is also integrated with AWS CloudTrail to provide you with logs of all key usage to help meet your regulatory and compliance needs.

Ellipticc — Cloud Storage Built for Privacy and Speed

Ellipticc — Cloud Storage Built for Privacy and Speed

Ellipticc — End-to-end encrypted, post-quantum secure cloud storage for privacy-first users and teams.

LocalKeys

LocalKeys

LocalKeys is a local-first secret manager for developers. It replaces vulnerable .env files with an AES-256-GCM encrypted vault that works completely offline and requires explicit approval before any process can access your secrets.

Azure Key Vault

Azure Key Vault

Secure key management is essential to protect data in the cloud. Use Azure Key Vault to encrypt keys and small secrets like passwords that use keys stored in hardware security modules (HSMs). For more assurance, import or generate keys in HSMs, and Microsoft processes your keys in FIPS 140-2 Level 2 validated HSMs (hardware and firmware). With Key Vault, Microsoft doesn’t see or extract your keys. Monitor and audit your key use with Azure logging—pipe logs into Azure HDInsight or your security information and event management (SIEM) solution for more analysis and threat detection.

F5

F5

It powers apps from development through their entire life cycle, so our customers can deliver differentiated, high-performing, and secure digital experiences.

OneTrust

OneTrust

A platform to help organizations be more trusted, and operationalize privacy, security, data governance, and compliance programs.

IBM QRadar

IBM QRadar

It is an enterprise security information and event management (SIEM) product. It includes out-of-the-box analytics, correlation rules and dashboards to help customers address their most pressing security use cases — without requiring significant customization effort.

Imperva

Imperva

It provides complete cyber security by protecting what really matters most—your data and applications—whether on-premises or in the cloud.

Acra

Acra

It provides data protection in distributed applications, web and mobile apps with PostgreSQL, MySQL, KV backends through selective encryption.

AWS CloudHSM

AWS CloudHSM

The AWS CloudHSM service allows you to protect your encryption keys within HSMs designed and validated to government standards for secure key management. You can securely generate, store, and manage the cryptographic keys used for data encryption such that they are accessible only by you. AWS CloudHSM helps you comply with strict key management requirements without sacrificing application performance.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope