StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Cypress vs Robot Framework

Cypress vs Robot Framework

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Robot Framework
Robot Framework
Stacks344
Followers525
Votes120
Cypress
Cypress
Stacks3.5K
Followers2.0K
Votes115
GitHub Stars49.4K
Forks3.4K

Cypress vs Robot Framework: What are the differences?

Cypress and Robot Framework are both popular automation testing tools that are used to test web applications. Here are the key differences between the two:

  1. Architecture: Cypress is a JavaScript-based end-to-end testing framework that runs directly in the browser. It executes tests in the same run loop as the application being tested, allowing it to directly access and modify the application's DOM. On the other hand, Robot Framework is a generic open-source automation framework that uses a keyword-driven testing approach. It provides a simple and readable syntax for test case development.

  2. Language Support: Cypress is primarily focused on testing web applications built with JavaScript frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue. It provides built-in support for writing tests in JavaScript. Robot Framework, on the other hand, supports multiple programming languages such as Python, Java, and C#. This allows testers to choose the language they are most comfortable with for test case development.

  3. Test Execution: Cypress runs tests in a single process and within the browser, giving it full control over the application's environment. It can automatically wait for elements to become visible, handle AJAX requests, and prevent flaky tests. Robot Framework, on the other hand, executes tests by using a separate test runner. This allows it to run tests in parallel and distribute test execution across multiple machines, making it suitable for large-scale test automation.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Cypress has a growing community and a vibrant ecosystem. It provides comprehensive documentation, a dedicated support team, and regular updates with new features. Robot Framework, on the other hand, has a large and active community with extensive support and a wide range of external libraries and extensions that can be used to extend its functionality.

  5. Test Maintenance: Cypress provides a rich API that allows developers to easily interact with elements, perform assertions, and handle different scenarios in their tests. It also provides features like auto-waiting, time-travel debugging, and real-time reload. Robot Framework, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and readability. Its keyword-driven approach makes it easier to write and maintain tests, especially for testers who are not proficient in programming.

  6. Integration with CI/CD: Cypress provides built-in integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Travis CI. It can generate test reports in different formats and supports parallel test execution. Robot Framework also offers seamless integration with CI/CD tools and supports various reporting formats. It can be easily integrated into existing CI/CD pipelines for continuous testing.

In summary, Cypress is a JavaScript-based end-to-end testing framework with a focus on simplicity, while Robot Framework is a keyword-driven automation framework that supports multiple programming languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Robot Framework, Cypress

Dane
Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceonCypressCypressJestJest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

836k views836k
Comments
Yildiz
Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSTypeScriptTypeScriptCypressCypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Robot Framework
Robot Framework
Cypress
Cypress

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

-
Time Travel; Debuggability; Automatic Waiting; Spies, Stubs, and Clocks; Network Traffic Control; Consistent Results; Screenshots and Videos
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
49.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
344
Stacks
3.5K
Followers
525
Followers
2.0K
Votes
120
Votes
115
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 23
    Easy with CI/CD
  • 22
    Open Source
  • 21
    Simple Usage
  • 14
    Easily extendable
  • 13
    Vast Scope more than Front End
Cons
  • 8
    Nested Loops
  • 1
    Devtooling is not there
  • 1
    Mostly for python
  • 0
    Extensive library support
  • 0
    Mobile supports
Pros
  • 29
    Open source
  • 22
    Great documentation
  • 20
    Simple usage
  • 18
    Fast
  • 10
    Cross Browser testing
Cons
  • 21
    Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing
  • 14
    Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support
  • 12
    No iFrame support
  • 9
    No multiple domain support
  • 9
    No page object support

What are some alternatives to Robot Framework, Cypress?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Protractor

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana