Coverity Scan vs GitLab

Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Coverity Scan

Stacks50

Followers185

Votes0

Coverity Scan vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Coverity Scan: Coverity Scan is a static analysis tool that thoroughly scans the source code of software applications to detect and eliminate defects, security vulnerabilities, and to improve overall code quality. It integrates with a variety of development environments and provides detailed reports on identified issues, prioritizing them based on severity.
Gitlab: GitLab, on the other hand, is a complete DevOps platform that provides a range of features including source code management, CI/CD pipelines, issue tracking, and more. It offers a full-fledged collaboration environment for software development teams, allowing them to manage their codebase, track project progress, and automate deployment processes.
Focus: Coverity Scan primarily focuses on static code analysis, providing in-depth insights into code quality, security vulnerabilities, and potential defects. Its main purpose is to find and fix issues in the early stages of development to ensure a high-quality final product.
Coverage: GitLab, while offering some built-in code analysis capabilities, covers a broader range of development and DevOps processes beyond static code analysis. It provides a holistic platform for project management, version control, continuous integration, and deployment, making it suitable for end-to-end software development lifecycle management.
Integration: Coverity Scan can integrate with various development environments such as IDEs, build systems, and source code repositories, allowing developers to analyze their code seamlessly as part of their existing workflows. GitLab, on the other hand, is an all-in-one platform that offers an integrated set of features where code analysis is just one component.
Community-driven: Coverity Scan is a commercial product that requires licensing, and its development is mainly driven by its parent company Synopsys. GitLab, in contrast, is an open-source platform with a strong community-driven development model, allowing users and contributors from different organizations to actively participate in its evolution.

In summary, Coverity Scan is a specialized static code analysis tool focused on finding defects and vulnerabilities early in the development process, while GitLab is a comprehensive DevOps platform that includes code analysis among its many features, offering a broader range of development and collaboration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitLab, Coverity Scan

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	Coverity Scan
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	Coverity's implementation of static analysis can follow all the possible paths of execution through source code (including interprocedurally) and find defects and vulnerabilities caused by the conjunction of statements that are not errors independent of each other.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	Test every line of code and potential execution path.;The root cause of each defect is clearly explained, making it easy to fix bugs;Integrates with GitHub and Travis CI
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 50
Followers 54.5K	Followers 185
Votes 2.5K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	GitHub Travis CI

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Coverity Scan?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Related Comparisons

Coverity Scan vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Coverity Scan: Coverity Scan is a static analysis tool that thoroughly scans the source code of software applications to detect and eliminate defects, security vulnerabilities, and to improve overall code quality. It integrates with a variety of development environments and provides detailed reports on identified issues, prioritizing them based on severity.
Gitlab: GitLab, on the other hand, is a complete DevOps platform that provides a range of features including source code management, CI/CD pipelines, issue tracking, and more. It offers a full-fledged collaboration environment for software development teams, allowing them to manage their codebase, track project progress, and automate deployment processes.
Focus: Coverity Scan primarily focuses on static code analysis, providing in-depth insights into code quality, security vulnerabilities, and potential defects. Its main purpose is to find and fix issues in the early stages of development to ensure a high-quality final product.
Coverage: GitLab, while offering some built-in code analysis capabilities, covers a broader range of development and DevOps processes beyond static code analysis. It provides a holistic platform for project management, version control, continuous integration, and deployment, making it suitable for end-to-end software development lifecycle management.
Integration: Coverity Scan can integrate with various development environments such as IDEs, build systems, and source code repositories, allowing developers to analyze their code seamlessly as part of their existing workflows. GitLab, on the other hand, is an all-in-one platform that offers an integrated set of features where code analysis is just one component.
Community-driven: Coverity Scan is a commercial product that requires licensing, and its development is mainly driven by its parent company Synopsys. GitLab, in contrast, is an open-source platform with a strong community-driven development model, allowing users and contributors from different organizations to actively participate in its evolution.

Coverity Scan vs GitLab

Overview