StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. Conan vs NuGet

Conan vs NuGet

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NuGet
NuGet
Stacks10.2K
Followers172
Votes0
Conan
Conan
Stacks84
Followers108
Votes10
GitHub Stars9.0K
Forks1.1K

Conan vs NuGet: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Conan and NuGet

  1. Package Management Approach:
  • Conan: Conan is a decentralized package manager, which uses a "source code to binary" approach. It allows developers to manage dependencies by resolving and fetching source code, and then building and packaging it locally.
  • NuGet: NuGet is a centralized package manager that primarily focuses on managing binary packages. It allows developers to search, download, and install pre-compiled and packaged libraries and components into their projects.
  1. Compatibility and Language Support:
  • Conan: Conan supports multiple programming languages including C/C++, Python, and more. It is particularly well-suited for managing C/C++ dependencies where there is a need for more flexible package management options.
  • NuGet: NuGet primarily focuses on .NET ecosystem and is widely used for managing dependencies in projects developed using .NET framework and related languages such as C# and F#. It provides extensive support for .NET packages and libraries.
  1. Package Repository Management:
  • Conan: Conan allows for flexible package repository management. It enables developers to create their own private package repositories or use public package repositories like ConanCenter for sharing and distributing packages.
  • NuGet: NuGet utilizes the centralized NuGet.org repository as the default package source. Developers can publish their packages to NuGet.org for public availability and also create private package feeds using tools like Azure Artifacts.
  1. Versioning and Dependency Resolution:
  • Conan: Conan provides powerful versioning and dependency resolution capabilities. It supports different versioning strategies, including semantic versioning, and allows developers to handle complex dependency relationships, such as different versions of the same library for different projects.
  • NuGet: NuGet also supports versioning and dependency resolution, but the dependency graph is usually more straightforward. NuGet uses a range of versioning, where developers specify a minimum and maximum compatible version for a package, resulting in simpler dependencies.
  1. Build System Integration:
  • Conan: Conan integrates well with different build systems like CMake, Make, and others. It allows developers to seamlessly incorporate the package management workflow into their build scripts and automate the process of fetching and building dependencies.
  • NuGet: NuGet is tightly integrated with MSBuild, the build system used by .NET projects. It simplifies the addition of package references to the project files and automatically downloads and resolves dependencies during the build process.
  1. Community Contribution and Ecosystem:
  • Conan: Conan has a strong and growing community with active contributions from various users and organizations. It has a well-established ecosystem of Conan packages and plugins, offering a wide range of pre-built libraries and components for various programming languages and platforms.
  • NuGet: NuGet has a large community and is deeply integrated into the Microsoft ecosystem. It benefits from the vast number of packages available on NuGet.org, which covers a wide range of .NET libraries and frameworks.

In summary, Conan and NuGet differ in their package management approach, language support, repository management options, versioning and dependency resolution strategies, build system integration, and the size and focus of their respective communities and ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

NuGet
NuGet
Conan
Conan

A free and open-source package manager designed for the Microsoft development platform. It is also distributed as a Visual Studio extension.

Install or build your own packages for any platform. Conan also allows you to run your own server easily from the command line.

-
Dependencies and package management for developers; De-centralized; Source code and binaries; Full open-source stack; Simple, flexible and powerful scripting; Full control of dependencies; Free hosting service for free software;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
10.2K
Stacks
84
Followers
172
Followers
108
Votes
0
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 0
    Best package (and maybe only 1) management for .NET
Pros
  • 4
    Crossplatform builds
  • 3
    Easy to maintain used dependencies
  • 2
    Build recipes can be very flexble
  • 1
    Integrations with cmake, qmake and other build systems
Cons
  • 1
    3rd party recipes can be flawed
Integrations
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
.NET
.NET
C lang
C lang
C++
C++

What are some alternatives to NuGet, Conan?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Gemfury

Gemfury

Hosted service for your private and custom packages to simplify your deployment story. Once you upload your packages and enable your Gemfury repository, you can securely deploy any package to any host. Your private RubyGems, Python packages, and NPM modules will be safe and within reach on Gemfury. Install them to any machine in minutes without worrying about running and securing your own private repository.<br>

Bun

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana