StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. Composer vs ProGet

Composer vs ProGet

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Composer
Composer
Stacks1.2K
Followers559
Votes13
GitHub Stars29.2K
Forks4.7K
ProGet
ProGet
Stacks17
Followers6
Votes0

Composer vs ProGet: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of package management tools, Composer and ProGet stand out as popular choices for developers and organizations. Understanding the key differences between these two tools is essential for making informed decisions regarding package management in software development projects.

  1. Technology Stack Compatibility: Composer is specifically designed for PHP packages, making it a preferred choice for PHP developers. On the other hand, ProGet supports a wide range of technologies, including NuGet, npm, Maven, Docker, and more, catering to a broader audience beyond PHP developers.

  2. Deployment Flexibility: While Composer is primarily used for managing dependencies locally during the development phase, ProGet offers more robust deployment capabilities. ProGet allows users to create feeds, promote packages across environments, and enforce security policies, making it a versatile tool for deployment pipelines.

  3. Access Control and Security: ProGet offers advanced access control features, allowing administrators to manage user permissions, control package access, and ensure compliance with security requirements. Composer, on the other hand, focuses more on package management and does not provide as many built-in security features.

  4. Scalability and Performance: ProGet is designed to handle large-scale package management scenarios, offering scalability features such as caching, mirroring, and load balancing. Composer, while suitable for smaller projects, may face performance issues when dealing with a high volume of dependencies or multiple projects.

  5. Commercial Support and Enterprise Features: ProGet provides commercial support options and enterprise-grade features such as clustering, high availability, and integration with build servers, making it a suitable choice for organizations with complex software delivery requirements. Composer, being an open-source tool, relies more on community support and lacks some of the enterprise-oriented features offered by ProGet.

  6. User Interface and Ease of Use: ProGet offers a user-friendly web interface for managing packages, feeds, and users, making it easier for teams to collaborate and navigate the package repository. Composer, being a command-line tool, requires more manual intervention and familiarity with the command-line interface for package management tasks.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Composer and ProGet is crucial for selecting the right package management tool based on technology stack, deployment needs, security requirements, scalability, enterprise features, and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Composer
Composer
ProGet
ProGet

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

It allows users to host and manage personal or enterprise-wide packages, applications, and components. It was originally designed as a private NuGet manager and symbol and source server.

Locally; Globally
Share pre-built and pre-tested code; Scan and Validate Open-source Packages
Statistics
GitHub Stars
29.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
17
Followers
559
Followers
6
Votes
13
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Must have dependency manager for PHP
  • 3
    Centralized autoload.php
  • 3
    Large number of libraries
No community feedback yet
Integrations
PhpStorm
PhpStorm
Linux
Linux
JavaScript
JavaScript
PHP
PHP
PuPHPet
PuPHPet
MySQL
MySQL
ReactPHP
ReactPHP
macOS
macOS
Linux
Linux
NuGet
NuGet
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server

What are some alternatives to Composer, ProGet?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Bun

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

Homebrew

Homebrew

Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

fpm

fpm

It helps you build packages quickly and easily (Packages like RPM and DEB formats).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana