StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. CodeKit vs Webpack

CodeKit vs Webpack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K
CodeKit
CodeKit
Stacks69
Followers103
Votes28

CodeKit vs Webpack: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown code provides the key differences between CodeKit and Webpack, two popular tools used in web development. CodeKit is a task automation tool that helps in managing and organizing web projects, while Webpack is a module bundler for JavaScript applications.

  1. Build Process: CodeKit offers a simple and intuitive build process, where you can add files and define their order, and it takes care of preprocessing and compiling various assets. On the other hand, Webpack provides a more flexible and powerful build process, allowing you to define complex dependency graphs, perform module-based code splitting, and optimize assets using loaders and plugins.

  2. Hot Module Replacement: Webpack has the ability to perform hot module replacement, which allows for instant updates in the browser without the need for a full page reload. CodeKit, however, does not have this feature built-in and requires manual page refreshes when making changes to your code.

  3. Extensibility and Customization: CodeKit provides a user-friendly interface for managing various build tasks, but it has limited extensibility options compared to Webpack. Webpack, being highly configurable, allows you to customize and extend its functionality using loaders, plugins, and custom configuration files.

  4. JavaScript Ecosystem: Webpack is widely adopted in the JavaScript ecosystem and is the de facto standard for bundling JavaScript modules. It provides extensive support for module systems like CommonJS, AMD, and ES modules, allowing you to import and use third-party libraries easily. CodeKit, on the other hand, primarily focuses on preprocessing and compiling various assets and does not offer the same level of support for JavaScript modules.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Webpack has a large and active community, with a wide range of plugins and loaders available for various use cases. It has become the standard build tool for many JavaScript frameworks and libraries. CodeKit, while having a smaller community, still provides a decent selection of plugins and support for popular frameworks like Bootstrap and Foundation.

  6. Learning Curve: CodeKit has a relatively low learning curve compared to Webpack. It is designed to be user-friendly and provides a visual interface for managing build tasks. Webpack, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive configuration options and complex concepts like loaders, plugins, and code splitting.

In summary, CodeKit offers a simpler and more user-friendly approach to managing build tasks, while Webpack provides a more powerful and customizable solution with a vibrant ecosystem and extensive JavaScript module support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Webpack, CodeKit

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Webpack
Webpack
CodeKit
CodeKit

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Process Less, Sass, Stylus, Jade, Haml, Slim, CoffeeScript, Javascript, and Compass files automatically each time you save. Easily set options for each language.

Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
Compile Everything - Less, Sass, Stylus, CoffeeScript, Typescript, Jade, Haml, Slim, Markdown & Javascript.;Auto-Refresh Browsers - Refresh browsers across devices: Mac, PC, iOS, Android & kitchen fridge. Never hit command+R again.;Bower Built-In - Install 6,000+ components with a single click: Bootstrap, jQuery, Modernizr, Zurb Foundation, even WordPress.;It Just Works - There's no grunting at a command line and zero setup. Just drop your project on the app and go.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
45.0K
Stacks
69
Followers
28.1K
Followers
103
Votes
752
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    Spaghetti-Code out of the box
  • 2
    SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
  • 2
    Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers
Pros
  • 8
    Easy to configure
  • 8
    Instant setup for quick experiments
  • 7
    Cross device live reloading
  • 5
    Any editor OK
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Bower
Bower
Foundation
Foundation
Bourbon
Bourbon
Compass
Compass

What are some alternatives to Webpack, CodeKit?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Prepros

Prepros

It is an interface tool which handles pre-processing, and other front-end tasks. Its greatest strength is the incredible ease with which it allows you to use pre-processors of various kinds, be they for CSS, HTML or JavaScript.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

LiveReload

LiveReload

LiveReload monitors changes in the file system. As soon as you save a file, it is preprocessed as needed, and the browser is refreshed.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana