StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Live Reloading
  5. CodeKit vs Prepros

CodeKit vs Prepros

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CodeKit
CodeKit
Stacks69
Followers103
Votes28
Prepros
Prepros
Stacks23
Followers39
Votes21

CodeKit vs Prepros: What are the differences?

Introduction: CodeKit and Prepros are both tools used to streamline the development process by automating tasks such as compiling code, optimizing assets, and refreshing browsers. However, there are key differences between the two that make each one unique and preferred by different developers.

  1. Operating System Compatibility: CodeKit is exclusive to macOS, while Prepros is compatible with both macOS and Windows. This difference in operating system compatibility allows developers to choose the tool that best suits their preferred OS, making the development process more seamless and efficient for their specific setup.

  2. Price: CodeKit is a paid tool with a one-time cost, while Prepros offers a free version with limited features and a paid version with additional features. This pricing difference allows developers to choose the tool that fits their budget and requirements, whether they prefer a one-time payment or are comfortable with a subscription-based model.

  3. Third-Party Tool Support: CodeKit primarily focuses on providing a native experience for its supported languages and tools, while Prepros offers extensive third-party tool support. This means that Prepros can integrate with a wide range of third-party tools, plugins, and frameworks, giving developers more flexibility and options when it comes to their development environment.

  4. Interface and User Experience: CodeKit provides a visually pleasing and user-friendly interface, making it easy for developers to navigate and use the tool. Prepros also offers a clean and intuitive interface, but some users might prefer the aesthetics and overall user experience of CodeKit. This difference in interface and user experience can influence developers' preference for one tool over the other.

  5. Advanced Features: CodeKit offers advanced features like image optimization, CSS and JavaScript minification, and live browser reloading. Prepros also provides similar features, but it goes a step further by offering additional capabilities such as live synchronization across multiple devices and support for CSS preprocessors like Less and Sass. These advanced features differentiate the two tools and cater to specific development needs and preferences.

  6. Community and Support: CodeKit has a smaller community compared to Prepros, which means there might be fewer online resources and tutorials available for CodeKit users. On the other hand, Prepros has a larger community and a more established support network, making it easier for developers to find assistance and get their questions answered. Developers who value a strong community and support system might lean towards using Prepros for their projects.

In summary, CodeKit and Prepros differ in operating system compatibility, pricing, third-party tool support, interface and user experience, advanced features, and community and support. These differences enable developers to choose the tool that aligns with their specific requirements, preferences, and development environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CodeKit
CodeKit
Prepros
Prepros

Process Less, Sass, Stylus, Jade, Haml, Slim, CoffeeScript, Javascript, and Compass files automatically each time you save. Easily set options for each language.

It is an interface tool which handles pre-processing, and other front-end tasks. Its greatest strength is the incredible ease with which it allows you to use pre-processors of various kinds, be they for CSS, HTML or JavaScript.

Compile Everything - Less, Sass, Stylus, CoffeeScript, Typescript, Jade, Haml, Slim, Markdown & Javascript.;Auto-Refresh Browsers - Refresh browsers across devices: Mac, PC, iOS, Android & kitchen fridge. Never hit command+R again.;Bower Built-In - Install 6,000+ components with a single click: Bootstrap, jQuery, Modernizr, Zurb Foundation, even WordPress.;It Just Works - There's no grunting at a command line and zero setup. Just drop your project on the app and go.
Find Out Errors At a Glance; Live Reload; Minify & Optimize; Network Preview; Browser Sync
Statistics
Stacks
69
Stacks
23
Followers
103
Followers
39
Votes
28
Votes
21
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Instant setup for quick experiments
  • 8
    Easy to configure
  • 7
    Cross device live reloading
  • 5
    Any editor OK
Pros
  • 4
    Beautiful GUI
  • 4
    Easy to configure
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    FTP upload
  • 2
    Live reload
Integrations
Bower
Bower
Foundation
Foundation
Bourbon
Bourbon
Compass
Compass
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
CoffeeScript
CoffeeScript
Slim
Slim
Less
Less
Pug
Pug
Markdown
Markdown
Stylus
Stylus
macOS
macOS
Jade Language
Jade Language

What are some alternatives to CodeKit, Prepros?

LiveReload

LiveReload

LiveReload monitors changes in the file system. As soon as you save a file, it is preprocessed as needed, and the browser is refreshed.

BrowserSync

BrowserSync

BrowserSync makes your tweaking and testing faster by synchronising file changes and interactions across multiple devices. It’s wicked-fast and totally free.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana