Codecov vs GitLab

Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Codecov

Stacks2.8K

Followers325

Votes102

Codecov vs GitLab: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Code Coverage Analysis: Codecov provides detailed code coverage analysis reports, highlighting which lines of code have been tested during the development process, giving insights into the quality of testing. GitLab, on the other hand, also offers code coverage analysis but with more limited features and integrations compared to Codecov.
Integration and Accessibility: Codecov offers seamless integration with various popular version control systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, making it easier for developers to incorporate code coverage analysis into their workflow. In contrast, GitLab provides code coverage tools within its platform, reducing the need for external integrations but potentially limiting compatibility with other systems.
Customization and Reporting: Codecov allows users to customize their code coverage reports, generate detailed visual representations, and access historical data to track progress over time. GitLab, although it offers code coverage reports, may have less flexibility in terms of customization and in-depth reporting capabilities compared to Codecov.
Community Support and Documentation: Codecov has a strong community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation, support forums, and resources for developers to troubleshoot issues and optimize their code coverage analysis. GitLab, while also having a supportive community, may not have the same level of specialized focus on code coverage as Codecov.
Ease of Use and User Interface: Codecov is known for its user-friendly interface, intuitive navigation, and easy-to-understand visual representations of code coverage data, making it accessible to developers of all skill levels. GitLab, while improving its interface over time, may still have a slightly steeper learning curve and less polished user experience for code coverage analysis.
Cost and Pricing Models: Codecov offers a range of pricing plans, including free tiers for individual developers and small teams, as well as premium plans with advanced features for larger organizations. GitLab, being a comprehensive DevOps platform, includes code coverage analysis as part of its broader suite of tools, which may be more cost-effective for organizations looking for an all-in-one solution.

In Summary, the key differences between Codecov and GitLab lie in their depth of code coverage analysis features, integration options, customization abilities, community support, user interface, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitLab, Codecov

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	Codecov
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	Beautiful Reports;Pull Request Comments;Interactive Commit Graphs;Chrome Extension;Github Commit Status;Easy to Integrate;Hipchat Integration
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 2.8K
Followers 54.5K	Followers 325
Votes 2.5K	Votes 102
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	Pros 17 More stable than coveralls 17 Easy setup 14 GitHub integration 11 They reply their users 10 Easy setup,great ui Cons 1 GitHub org / team integration is a little too tight 0 Support does not respond to email 0 Delayed results by hours since recent outage
Integrations
No integrations available	HipChat Jenkins Bitbucket GitHub CircleCI Heroku

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Codecov?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Coveralls

Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

Codecov vs GitLab: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Code Coverage Analysis: Codecov provides detailed code coverage analysis reports, highlighting which lines of code have been tested during the development process, giving insights into the quality of testing. GitLab, on the other hand, also offers code coverage analysis but with more limited features and integrations compared to Codecov.
Integration and Accessibility: Codecov offers seamless integration with various popular version control systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, making it easier for developers to incorporate code coverage analysis into their workflow. In contrast, GitLab provides code coverage tools within its platform, reducing the need for external integrations but potentially limiting compatibility with other systems.
Customization and Reporting: Codecov allows users to customize their code coverage reports, generate detailed visual representations, and access historical data to track progress over time. GitLab, although it offers code coverage reports, may have less flexibility in terms of customization and in-depth reporting capabilities compared to Codecov.
Community Support and Documentation: Codecov has a strong community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation, support forums, and resources for developers to troubleshoot issues and optimize their code coverage analysis. GitLab, while also having a supportive community, may not have the same level of specialized focus on code coverage as Codecov.
Ease of Use and User Interface: Codecov is known for its user-friendly interface, intuitive navigation, and easy-to-understand visual representations of code coverage data, making it accessible to developers of all skill levels. GitLab, while improving its interface over time, may still have a slightly steeper learning curve and less polished user experience for code coverage analysis.
Cost and Pricing Models: Codecov offers a range of pricing plans, including free tiers for individual developers and small teams, as well as premium plans with advanced features for larger organizations. GitLab, being a comprehensive DevOps platform, includes code coverage analysis as part of its broader suite of tools, which may be more cost-effective for organizations looking for an all-in-one solution.

Codecov vs GitLab

Overview