Codecov vs GitHub Enterprise

Overview

Codecov

Stacks2.8K

Followers324

Votes102

GitHub Enterprise

Stacks500

Followers627

Votes10

Codecov vs GitHub Enterprise: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In comparing Codecov and GitHub Enterprise, it is essential to delve into their key differences to determine which platform best suits your needs.

Integration with Version Control Systems: Codecov integrates with various version control systems such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, while GitHub Enterprise is a self-hosted platform exclusive to GitHub repositories.
Pricing Model: Codecov offers a free tier with limitations on usage and additional paid plans based on usage metrics, while GitHub Enterprise requires a paid subscription for on-premises hosting and is priced per user or per instance.
Supported Languages and Technologies: Codecov supports a wide range of programming languages and technologies, making it versatile for different projects, whereas GitHub Enterprise is tailored specifically for projects hosted on GitHub repositories.
Security and Compliance: GitHub Enterprise provides enhanced security features and compliance measures specifically designed for enterprise-level organizations, while Codecov focuses more on code coverage analysis and integration with existing tools.
Community and Support: Codecov has an active community of users and contributors that frequently provide support and updates, whereas GitHub Enterprise offers dedicated support options and services for its enterprise customers.
Customization and Extensions: GitHub Enterprise allows for extensive customization and integration with third-party apps and services to enhance project management capabilities, while Codecov offers limited customization options focused primarily on code coverage analysis.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Codecov and GitHub Enterprise can help in selecting the most suitable platform based on specific project requirements and organizational needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Codecov, GitHub Enterprise

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Codecov	GitHub Enterprise
Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.	GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
Beautiful Reports;Pull Request Comments;Interactive Commit Graphs;Chrome Extension;Github Commit Status;Easy to Integrate;Hipchat Integration	Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Statistics
Stacks 2.8K	Stacks 500
Followers 324	Followers 627
Votes 102	Votes 10
Pros & Cons
Pros 17 More stable than coveralls 17 Easy setup 14 GitHub integration 11 They reply their users 10 Easy setup,great ui Cons 1 GitHub org / team integration is a little too tight 0 Support does not respond to email 0 Delayed results by hours since recent outage	Pros 4 Expensive - $$$ 2 CDCI with Github Actions 2 Code security 1 Draft Pull Request 1 Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available Cons 2 $$$
Integrations
HipChat Jenkins Bitbucket GitLab GitHub CircleCI Heroku	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Codecov, GitHub Enterprise?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Coveralls

Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Codecov vs GitHub Enterprise: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In comparing Codecov and GitHub Enterprise, it is essential to delve into their key differences to determine which platform best suits your needs.

Integration with Version Control Systems: Codecov integrates with various version control systems such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, while GitHub Enterprise is a self-hosted platform exclusive to GitHub repositories.
Pricing Model: Codecov offers a free tier with limitations on usage and additional paid plans based on usage metrics, while GitHub Enterprise requires a paid subscription for on-premises hosting and is priced per user or per instance.
Supported Languages and Technologies: Codecov supports a wide range of programming languages and technologies, making it versatile for different projects, whereas GitHub Enterprise is tailored specifically for projects hosted on GitHub repositories.
Security and Compliance: GitHub Enterprise provides enhanced security features and compliance measures specifically designed for enterprise-level organizations, while Codecov focuses more on code coverage analysis and integration with existing tools.
Community and Support: Codecov has an active community of users and contributors that frequently provide support and updates, whereas GitHub Enterprise offers dedicated support options and services for its enterprise customers.
Customization and Extensions: GitHub Enterprise allows for extensive customization and integration with third-party apps and services to enhance project management capabilities, while Codecov offers limited customization options focused primarily on code coverage analysis.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Codecov and GitHub Enterprise can help in selecting the most suitable platform based on specific project requirements and organizational needs.