StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. CodeceptJS vs Codeception

CodeceptJS vs Codeception

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Codeception
Codeception
Stacks155
Followers111
Votes5
CodeceptJS
CodeceptJS
Stacks117
Followers217
Votes52

CodeceptJS vs Codeception: What are the differences?

Introduction

CodeceptJS and Codeception are two popular testing frameworks that are widely used for web application testing. While they share similar names and purposes, there are several key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences and highlight their unique features.

  1. Test Automation Framework: CodeceptJS is a test automation framework specifically designed for Node.js applications. It provides a simple and intuitive syntax for writing tests and supports various testing libraries and frameworks such as WebDriver, Puppeteer, and Protractor. On the other hand, Codeception is a full-stack testing framework that supports multiple programming languages, including PHP, Ruby, and Python. It offers a unified API for testing web applications using different testing libraries like Selenium, WebDriver, and REST.

  2. Syntax and API: CodeceptJS uses a specific syntax known as Gherkin, which allows for writing tests using a natural language format. This makes the tests more readable and easier to understand, especially for non-technical stakeholders. CodeceptJS also provides a set of high-level actions called "helpers" that encapsulate complex operations and reduce the amount of code needed for test automation. In contrast, Codeception uses a more traditional code-based syntax with PHP annotations for defining test cases and actions. It provides a wide range of built-in modules that can be used to perform common testing tasks.

  3. Extensibility and Customization: CodeceptJS offers robust extensibility options through plugins and configuration files. It allows users to easily add custom helpers, modules, and plugins to tailor the testing framework to their specific needs. Additionally, CodeceptJS supports TypeScript, enabling developers to write tests using strong type checking and modern JavaScript features. Codeception, on the other hand, provides a flexible architecture that allows users to extend the framework through custom modules and plugins. It also offers built-in support for various third-party libraries and tools, making it highly customizable.

  4. Parallel Execution: CodeceptJS supports parallel test execution out of the box, which allows multiple tests to run simultaneously and significantly reduces the overall execution time. It achieves parallelism by running tests in separate processes, making efficient use of available system resources. Codeception, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for parallel execution. However, it provides integration with various third-party tools and services, such as Selenium Grid and Docker, which can be used to achieve parallel test execution.

  5. Reporting and Debugging: CodeceptJS provides detailed and user-friendly test reports with screenshots and logs, making it easier to diagnose and fix issues. It also offers integrations with popular CI/CD platforms like Jenkins and CircleCI, allowing for seamless integration into the development workflow. Codeception, on the other hand, provides comprehensive test result reports with detailed information about test failures and errors. It also offers built-in debugging tools, such as step-by-step execution and interactive shell mode, for troubleshooting test failures.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: CodeceptJS has a growing community and an active ecosystem of plugins and extensions. It has gained popularity in the JavaScript testing community due to its simplicity and modular architecture. CodeceptJS also provides extensive documentation and example projects, making it easier for new users to get started. Codeception, on the other hand, has a larger and more mature community with years of development and community-driven improvements. It has a wide range of community-built modules, plugins, and extensions, making it a popular choice for web application testing.

In Summary, CodeceptJS is a test automation framework specifically designed for Node.js applications, with a focus on simplicity and readability through its Gherkin syntax and helper functions. On the other hand, Codeception is a full-stack testing framework that supports multiple languages and offers a more traditional code-based syntax with extensive customization options and a larger community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Codeception
Codeception
CodeceptJS
CodeceptJS

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

-
Behavior Driven Development; Acceptance Testing; Data Driven Tests
Statistics
Stacks
155
Stacks
117
Followers
111
Followers
217
Votes
5
Votes
52
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to get up and running some simple tests
Pros
  • 10
    Readability
  • 9
    Full browser control
  • 9
    Cross browser support
  • 8
    Open source
  • 6
    Community
Cons
  • 2
    Small community
  • 1
    Not a framework by itself
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
SilverStripe
SilverStripe
Wallaby.js
Wallaby.js
MockIt (open source)
MockIt (open source)
Glamorous
Glamorous
Majestic GUI
Majestic GUI

What are some alternatives to Codeception, CodeceptJS?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Protractor

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana