Home
DevOps
Monitoring
Logging Tools

CocoaLumberjack vs Zap

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CocoaLumberjack
48
34
+ 1
0
Zap
10
30
+ 1
0
Add tool

CocoaLumberjack vs Zap: What are the differences?

CocoaLumberjack: A fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS. CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS; Zap: Blazing fast, structured, leveled logging in Go (by Uber). Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API.

CocoaLumberjack and Zap can be primarily classified as "Logging" tools.

CocoaLumberjack and Zap are both open source tools. CocoaLumberjack with 11.4K GitHub stars and 1.97K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Zap with 7.22K GitHub stars and 553 GitHub forks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More

What is CocoaLumberjack?

CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS.

What is Zap?

Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use CocoaLumberjack?
What companies use Zap?
See which teams inside your own company are using CocoaLumberjack or Zap.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with CocoaLumberjack?
What tools integrate with Zap?
What are some alternatives to CocoaLumberjack and Zap?
SwiftyBeaver
It is Swift-based logging framework for iOS and macOS. It has different types of log messages where also we can filter logs to make bug checking even easier and has a free license plan.
Log4j
It is an open source logging framework. With this tool – logging behavior can be controlled by editing a configuration file only without touching the application binary and can be used to store the Selenium Automation flow logs.
Castle Core
It provides common Castle Project abstractions including logging services. It also features Castle DynamicProxy a lightweight runtime proxy generator, and Castle DictionaryAdapter.
Loki
Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream.
Bunyan
It is a simple and fast JSON logging module for node.js services. It has extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.)
See all alternatives

Related Comparisons

LogDevice vs ZapCocoaLumberjack vs LoggrCocoaLumberjack vs LogDeviceWillow Logging vs ZapCocoaLumberjack vs Willow Logging

Trending Comparisons

Django vs Laravel vs Node.jsBootstrap vs Foundation vs Material-UINode.js vs Spring BootFlyway vs LiquibaseAWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Top Comparisons

Bootstrap vs MaterializeBitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLabPostman vs Swagger UIHipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack