StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Closure Compiler vs Weave

Closure Compiler vs Weave

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Weave
Weave
Stacks50
Followers72
Votes7
Closure Compiler
Closure Compiler
Stacks281
Followers62
Votes5
GitHub Stars7.6K
Forks1.2K

Closure Compiler vs Weave: What are the differences?

Developers describe Closure Compiler as "A JavaScript checker and optimizer". The Closure Compiler is a tool for making JavaScript download and run faster. It is a true compiler for JavaScript. Instead of compiling from a source language to machine code, it compiles from JavaScript to better JavaScript. It parses your JavaScript, analyzes it, removes dead code and rewrites and minimizes what's left. It also checks syntax, variable references, and types, and warns about common JavaScript pitfalls. On the other hand, Weave is detailed as "Weave creates a virtual network that connects Docker containers deployed across multiple hosts". Weave can traverse firewalls and operate in partially connected networks. Traffic can be encrypted, allowing hosts to be connected across an untrusted network. With weave you can easily construct applications consisting of multiple containers, running anywhere.

Closure Compiler can be classified as a tool in the "JavaScript Optimizers" category, while Weave is grouped under "Container Tools".

Some of the features offered by Closure Compiler are:

  • parses JavaScript, analyzes it, removes dead code and rewrites and minimizes what's left
  • checks syntax, variable references, and types, and warns about common JavaScript pitfalls
  • transpiling some ECMAScript 6 code to ECMAScript 3

On the other hand, Weave provides the following key features:

  • Virtual Ethernet Switch
  • Application isolation
  • Security

Closure Compiler and Weave are both open source tools. Weave with 6.06K GitHub stars and 611 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Closure Compiler with 5.93K GitHub stars and 1.07K GitHub forks.

Udacity, D2C, and ONZO are some of the popular companies that use Weave, whereas Closure Compiler is used by Lucid Software, Socialbakers, and Xerpa. Weave has a broader approval, being mentioned in 15 company stacks & 32 developers stacks; compared to Closure Compiler, which is listed in 9 company stacks and 27 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Weave
Weave
Closure Compiler
Closure Compiler

Weave can traverse firewalls and operate in partially connected networks. Traffic can be encrypted, allowing hosts to be connected across an untrusted network. With weave you can easily construct applications consisting of multiple containers, running anywhere.

The Closure Compiler is a tool for making JavaScript download and run faster. It is a true compiler for JavaScript. Instead of compiling from a source language to machine code, it compiles from JavaScript to better JavaScript. It parses your JavaScript, analyzes it, removes dead code and rewrites and minimizes what's left. It also checks syntax, variable references, and types, and warns about common JavaScript pitfalls.

Virtual Ethernet Switch;Application isolation;Security;Host network integration;Service export;Service import;Multi-cloud networking;Multi-hop routing;Dynamic topologies;Container mobility;Fault tolerance
parses JavaScript, analyzes it, removes dead code and rewrites and minimizes what's left; checks syntax, variable references, and types, and warns about common JavaScript pitfalls; transpiling some ECMAScript 6 code to ECMAScript 3
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
50
Stacks
281
Followers
72
Followers
62
Votes
7
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Seamlessly with mesos/marathon
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Seamless integration with application layer
Pros
  • 1
    Bundle support for CommonJS, ES6, .
  • 1
    The best performing output
  • 1
    Small output size
  • 1
    Dead code elimination
  • 1
    ES6 support
Integrations
Docker
Docker
boot2docker
boot2docker
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Weave, Closure Compiler?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana