StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Docker Registry
  5. Clair vs Quay.io

Clair vs Quay.io

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Quay.io
Quay.io
Stacks64
Followers86
Votes7
Clair
Clair
Stacks41
Followers57
Votes0

Clair vs Quay.io: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Clair and Quay.io

  1. Cost: One of the key differences between Clair and Quay.io is their cost structure. Clair is an open-source vulnerability scanner that is free to use, while Quay.io is a commercial container registry platform that requires a subscription for access to its advanced features and services.

  2. Scanning Method: Another significant difference between Clair and Quay.io is their scanning method. Clair utilizes static analysis to scan container images for vulnerabilities by comparing them against a database of known vulnerabilities. On the other hand, Quay.io employs a dynamic scanning approach, which analyzes the behavior of running containers to detect security issues in real-time.

  3. Integration and Ecosystem: Clair, being an open-source tool, can be easily integrated into existing development pipelines and workflows due to its flexibility and compatibility with various container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. Quay.io, being a commercial product, offers tight integration with other Red Hat technologies and the OpenShift container platform.

  4. Enterprise-Grade Features: Quay.io provides additional enterprise-grade features and capabilities, such as integrated access control, vulnerability notifications, and compliance scanning. These features make Quay.io more suitable for large organizations with complex security and compliance requirements.

  5. Community Support: Since Clair is an open-source project, it benefits from a larger community of contributors and developers. This leads to frequent updates, improvements, and a broader range of available plugins and integrations compared to Quay.io.

  6. User Interface and User Experience: Quay.io offers a more polished and user-friendly interface with intuitive navigation and extensive documentation aimed at simplifying tasks such as image management, permissions management, and monitoring. In contrast, Clair, being primarily a command-line tool, may have a steeper learning curve and require more advanced technical knowledge for effective use.

In Summary, Clair is a free, open-source vulnerability scanner that utilizes static analysis, while Quay.io is a commercial container registry platform with dynamic scanning capabilities, additional enterprise features, and a more user-friendly interface.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Quay.io
Quay.io
Clair
Clair

Simply upload your Dockerfile (and any additional files it needs) and we'll build your Dockerfile into an image and push it to your repository.

Clair is a container vulnerability analysis service by CoreOS. It provides the list of vulnerabilities that threaten each container and can sends notifications whenever new vulnerabilities that affect existing containers are released.

Secure - Your data is transferred using SSL at all times and encrypted when at rest. More information available in our security guide;Shareable - Have to share a repository? No problem! Share with anyone you choose;Cloud Hosted - Accessible from anywhere, anytime
Api defines how users interact with Clair and exposes a documented HTTP API; Worker extracts useful informations from layers and store everything in the database; Updater periodically updates Clair's vulnerability database from known vulnerability sources; Notifier dispatches notifications about vulnerable containers when vulnerabilities are released or updated; Database persists layers informations and vulnerabilities in Cayley graph database; Health summarizes health checks of every Clair's services
Statistics
Stacks
64
Stacks
41
Followers
86
Followers
57
Votes
7
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Great UI
  • 1
    API
  • 0
    Docker cloud repositories are public by default. Bad
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Quay.io, Clair?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana