StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Network Monitoring
  5. Cisco DNA Center vs Wireshark

Cisco DNA Center vs Wireshark

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Wireshark
Wireshark
Stacks95
Followers57
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.6K
Forks2.1K
Cisco DNA Center
Cisco DNA Center
Stacks14
Followers15
Votes0

Cisco DNA Center vs Wireshark: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Integration and Network Management**: Cisco DNA Center offers an integrated network management solution that provides a centralized platform for managing and automating network operations, while Wireshark is primarily a network protocol analyzer used for troubleshooting network issues at a packet level.

2. **Automated Provisioning**: Cisco DNA Center enables automated provisioning of network devices and services through intent-based policies, streamlining network deployment and configuration processes. However, Wireshark lacks this capability as it focuses on capturing and analyzing network traffic for diagnostic purposes.

3. **Visualization and Reporting**: Cisco DNA Center provides intuitive dashboards and reporting tools that simplify network monitoring and troubleshooting tasks by visualizing network data in a user-friendly manner. In contrast, Wireshark offers detailed packet inspection and analysis but lacks the advanced visualization features of Cisco DNA Center.

4. **Security Features**: Cisco DNA Center incorporates advanced security features such as threat intelligence, policy enforcement, and segmentation to enhance network security posture. Wireshark, on the other hand, is primarily a tool for analyzing network traffic and does not include robust security functions.

5. **Scalability and Multi-Vendor Support**: Cisco DNA Center is designed to scale across large enterprise networks and offers support for multi-vendor environments, allowing users to manage diverse network infrastructures from a single interface. Wireshark, while versatile in analyzing network protocols, does not provide the same level of scalability and multi-vendor support as Cisco DNA Center.

6. **Real-time Monitoring and Troubleshooting**: Cisco DNA Center enables real-time monitoring of network performance metrics and offers built-in troubleshooting tools for proactive issue identification and resolution. Wireshark, although powerful for packet analysis, lacks the real-time monitoring capabilities and automated troubleshooting features of Cisco DNA Center.

In Summary, Cisco DNA Center provides an integrated network management solution with automated provisioning, advanced visualization, security features, scalability, and real-time monitoring capabilities, whereas Wireshark specializes in packet-level network analysis without the broader network management functionalities of Cisco DNA Center.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Wireshark
Wireshark
Cisco DNA Center
Cisco DNA Center

It is the world’s foremost and widely-used network protocol analyzer. It lets you see what’s happening on your network at a microscopic level and is the de facto standard across many commercial and non-profit enterprises, government agencies, and educational institutions.

It is the network management and command center for Cisco DNA, your intent-based network for the enterprise. Provision and configure all your network devices in minutes. Use advanced artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to proactively monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize your network. Integrate with third-party systems for improved operational processes.​

Deep inspection of hundreds of protocols, with more being added all the time; Live capture and offline analysis; Standard three-pane packet browser; Multi-platform: Runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, Solaris, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and many others; Captured network data can be browsed via a GUI, or via the TTY-mode TShark utility
Translate business intent into zero-trust network policies. Identify all endpoints and optimize user experience based on business requirements; Automate deployment and management of network devices and integration of security solutions, to promote consistency across configurations, reduce errors, and save time; Analytics and AI/ML combined with Cisco best practices help to optimize your network's performance, reduce troubleshooting time, and lower the cost of network operations; Discover rogue devices and configuration inconsistencies through extended integrations with Cisco ISE, Stealthwatch, Umbrella, and third-party NAC/NAS
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
95
Stacks
14
Followers
57
Followers
15
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Oracle Solaris
Oracle Solaris
Cisco ISE
Cisco ISE

What are some alternatives to Wireshark, Cisco DNA Center?

Riemann

Riemann

Riemann aggregates events from your servers and applications with a powerful stream processing language. Send an email for every exception in your app. Track the latency distribution of your web app. See the top processes on any host, by memory and CPU.

Packetbeat

Packetbeat

Packetbeat agents sniff the traffic between your application processes, parse on the fly protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Postgresql or REDIS and correlate the messages into transactions.

Observium

Observium

It is a low-maintenance auto-discovering network monitoring platform supporting a wide range of device types, platforms and operating systems

Beats

Beats

Beats is the platform for single-purpose data shippers. They send data from hundreds or thousands of machines and systems to Logstash or Elasticsearch.

PRTG

PRTG

It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.

LibreNMS

LibreNMS

It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more.

Tailscale

Tailscale

It connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Create a secure network between your servers, computers, and cloud instances. Even when separated by firewalls or subnets, Tailscale just works. It makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

Snort

Snort

It is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.

Nagios XI

Nagios XI

It is the most powerful and trusted network monitoring software on the market. It extends on proven, enterprise-class Open Source components to deliver the best network, server and application monitoring solution for today's demanding organizational requirements.

Pi-hole

Pi-hole

It is a DNS sinkhole that protects your devices from unwanted content, without installing any client-side software. You can run it in a container, or deploy it directly to a supported operating system via our automated installer.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana