Cisco DNA Center vs Cisco ISE

Overview

Cisco ISE

Stacks19

Followers26

Votes0

Cisco DNA Center

Stacks14

Followers15

Votes0

Cisco DNA Center vs Cisco ISE: What are the differences?

Cisco DNA Center and Cisco ISE serve different purposes in network management and security. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Network Management vs. Network Access Control: Cisco DNA Center is a network management solution that provides centralized visibility and control over network infrastructure, automation of network configuration and troubleshooting, and network analytics. On the other hand, Cisco ISE is a network access control solution that focuses on managing user and device access to the network, enforcing security policies, and providing authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA) services.
Scope of Control: Cisco DNA Center primarily focuses on the management of network devices such as routers, switches, and access points, along with the associated policies and configurations. In contrast, Cisco ISE has a broader scope that extends beyond network devices and encompasses user and device identities, access policies, and integrations with various network resources and services.
Automation and Orchestration Capabilities: Cisco DNA Center is known for its powerful automation and orchestration capabilities. It can automate network configuration tasks, provision devices, and streamline network provisioning workflows. On the other hand, while Cisco ISE does have some automation capabilities, its main focus is on authentication and access control.
Security Policies and Enforcement: Cisco DNA Center primarily deals with network-wide security policies and configurations but does not provide granular user-level access control. In contrast, Cisco ISE is designed specifically for user access control and provides granular security policies, allowing organizations to enforce different levels of access based on user roles and other contextual attributes.
Integration with Other Solutions: Cisco DNA Center integrates well with other network management solutions in the Cisco ecosystem, such as Cisco SD-WAN, Cisco ACI, and Cisco Stealthwatch, providing end-to-end network visibility and control. Cisco ISE, on the other hand, is designed to integrate with security solutions, identity management systems, and other third-party tools to enforce access policies and provide additional security layers.
Usage Scenarios and Deployment: Cisco DNA Center is typically used in scenarios where network automation, management, and analytics are the primary requirements. It is commonly used in enterprise network environments. On the other hand, Cisco ISE is mostly deployed in situations where user access control and security enforcement are crucial, such as in organizations with strict compliance requirements or those that handle sensitive data.

In summary, Cisco DNA Center focuses on network management, automation, and analytics, while Cisco ISE specializes in network access control and security enforcement.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cisco ISE	Cisco DNA Center
A critical component of any zero-trust strategy is securing the environment that everyone and everything is connecting to: the workplace. It enables a dynamic and automated approach to policy enforcement that empowers software-defined access and automated network segmentation within IT and OT environments.	It is the network management and command center for Cisco DNA, your intent-based network for the enterprise. Provision and configure all your network devices in minutes. Use advanced artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to proactively monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize your network. Integrate with third-party systems for improved operational processes.
Gain visibility with context and control; Extend zero trust to contain threats; Accelerate value of existing solutions; Take the next step in secure access	Translate business intent into zero-trust network policies. Identify all endpoints and optimize user experience based on business requirements; Automate deployment and management of network devices and integration of security solutions, to promote consistency across configurations, reduce errors, and save time; Analytics and AI/ML combined with Cisco best practices help to optimize your network's performance, reduce troubleshooting time, and lower the cost of network operations; Discover rogue devices and configuration inconsistencies through extended integrations with Cisco ISE, Stealthwatch, Umbrella, and third-party NAC/NAS
Statistics
Stacks 19	Stacks 14
Followers 26	Followers 15
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to Cisco ISE, Cisco DNA Center?

Riemann

Riemann aggregates events from your servers and applications with a powerful stream processing language. Send an email for every exception in your app. Track the latency distribution of your web app. See the top processes on any host, by memory and CPU.

Packetbeat

Packetbeat agents sniff the traffic between your application processes, parse on the fly protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Postgresql or REDIS and correlate the messages into transactions.

Observium

It is a low-maintenance auto-discovering network monitoring platform supporting a wide range of device types, platforms and operating systems

Beats

Beats is the platform for single-purpose data shippers. They send data from hundreds or thousands of machines and systems to Logstash or Elasticsearch.

Wireshark

It is the world’s foremost and widely-used network protocol analyzer. It lets you see what’s happening on your network at a microscopic level and is the de facto standard across many commercial and non-profit enterprises, government agencies, and educational institutions.

PRTG

It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.

LibreNMS

It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more.

Tailscale

It connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Create a secure network between your servers, computers, and cloud instances. Even when separated by firewalls or subnets, Tailscale just works. It makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

Snort

It is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.

Nagios XI

It is the most powerful and trusted network monitoring software on the market. It extends on proven, enterprise-class Open Source components to deliver the best network, server and application monitoring solution for today's demanding organizational requirements.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Cisco DNA Center vs Cisco ISE: What are the differences?

Cisco DNA Center and Cisco ISE serve different purposes in network management and security. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Network Management vs. Network Access Control: Cisco DNA Center is a network management solution that provides centralized visibility and control over network infrastructure, automation of network configuration and troubleshooting, and network analytics. On the other hand, Cisco ISE is a network access control solution that focuses on managing user and device access to the network, enforcing security policies, and providing authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA) services.
Scope of Control: Cisco DNA Center primarily focuses on the management of network devices such as routers, switches, and access points, along with the associated policies and configurations. In contrast, Cisco ISE has a broader scope that extends beyond network devices and encompasses user and device identities, access policies, and integrations with various network resources and services.
Automation and Orchestration Capabilities: Cisco DNA Center is known for its powerful automation and orchestration capabilities. It can automate network configuration tasks, provision devices, and streamline network provisioning workflows. On the other hand, while Cisco ISE does have some automation capabilities, its main focus is on authentication and access control.
Security Policies and Enforcement: Cisco DNA Center primarily deals with network-wide security policies and configurations but does not provide granular user-level access control. In contrast, Cisco ISE is designed specifically for user access control and provides granular security policies, allowing organizations to enforce different levels of access based on user roles and other contextual attributes.
Integration with Other Solutions: Cisco DNA Center integrates well with other network management solutions in the Cisco ecosystem, such as Cisco SD-WAN, Cisco ACI, and Cisco Stealthwatch, providing end-to-end network visibility and control. Cisco ISE, on the other hand, is designed to integrate with security solutions, identity management systems, and other third-party tools to enforce access policies and provide additional security layers.
Usage Scenarios and Deployment: Cisco DNA Center is typically used in scenarios where network automation, management, and analytics are the primary requirements. It is commonly used in enterprise network environments. On the other hand, Cisco ISE is mostly deployed in situations where user access control and security enforcement are crucial, such as in organizations with strict compliance requirements or those that handle sensitive data.

In summary, Cisco DNA Center focuses on network management, automation, and analytics, while Cisco ISE specializes in network access control and security enforcement.