Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Chromeless vs Puppeteer: What are the differences?
What is Chromeless? 🖥 Chrome automation made simple. Runs locally or headless on AWS Lambda. Chrome automation made simple. Runs locally or headless on AWS Lambda.
What is Puppeteer? Headless Chrome Node API. Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.
Chromeless and Puppeteer can be primarily classified as "Headless Browsers" tools.
Chromeless and Puppeteer are both open source tools. It seems that Puppeteer with 51.1K GitHub stars and 4.71K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Chromeless with 13.2K GitHub stars and 602 GitHub forks.
I am using Node 12 for server scripting and have a function to generate PDF and send it to a browser. Currently, we are using PhantomJS to generate a PDF. Some web post shows that we can achieve PDF generation using Puppeteer. I was a bit confused. Should we move to puppeteerJS? Which one is better with NodeJS for generating PDF?
You better go with puppeteer. It is basically chrome automation tool, written in nodejs. So what you get is PDF, generated by chrome itself. I guess there is hardly better PDF generation tool for the web. Phantomjs is already more or less outdated as technology. It uses some old webkit port that's quite behind in terms of standards and features. It can be replaced with puppeteer for every single task.
I suggest puppeteer to go for. It is simple and easy to set up. Only limitaiton is it can be used only for chrome browser and currently they are looking into expanding into FF. The next thing is Playwright which is just a scale up of Puppeteer. It supports cross browsers.
Pros of Chromeless
Pros of Puppeteer
- Very well documented10
- Scriptable web browser10
- Promise based6
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Chromeless
Cons of Puppeteer
- Chrome only10