StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. Chocolatey vs ProGet

Chocolatey vs ProGet

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ProGet
ProGet
Stacks17
Followers6
Votes0
Chocolatey
Chocolatey
Stacks96
Followers124
Votes0

Chocolatey vs ProGet: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides key differences between Chocolatey and ProGet, two popular software package management tools.

  1. Deployment Process: Chocolatey is designed to be a client-side package manager that allows users to install and manage software packages on their local machines. It relies on running commands from the command line to perform various operations. On the other hand, ProGet is a server-side package repository manager that helps organizations create and manage their own internal package repositories.

  2. User Interface: Chocolatey primarily uses a command-line interface (CLI) for its operations, which may require some familiarity with command-line tools. ProGet, on the other hand, provides a web-based user interface (UI) that offers a more user-friendly experience, allowing users to perform package management tasks easily through a graphical interface.

  3. Enterprise Capabilities: ProGet offers advanced features tailored for enterprise environments, such as role-based access control (RBAC), permissions management, and auditing capabilities. These features make it suitable for large organizations with multiple teams and users who require fine-grained control over package management processes. Chocolatey, although not primary focusing on enterprise capabilities, still offers some features, but they are more limited.

  4. Package Sources: Chocolatey supports both official and community package sources, which allows users to access a wide range of packages from different sources. ProGet, on the other hand, is more focused on creating and managing private/internal package sources, making it an ideal choice for organizations that want to host and manage their custom packages.

  5. Integration with Build Systems: ProGet provides seamless integration with popular build systems and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, allowing packages to be automatically published and consumed in the build process. This integration facilitates the automated deployment and versioning of packages within the software development lifecycle. Chocolatey can also be integrated with build systems, but it may require some additional configuration to achieve similar functionality.

  6. Support and Documentation: Both Chocolatey and ProGet have extensive documentation available, including guides, tutorials, and community forums. However, due to its wider user base and community involvement, Chocolatey often benefits from a more vibrant support ecosystem, with a larger number of available resources, community-contributed packages, and active community forums.

In Summary, Chocolatey focuses on client-side software package management with a command-line interface, while ProGet is a server-side package repository manager with a web-based user interface that offers enterprise capabilities, including RBAC and integration with build systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ProGet
ProGet
Chocolatey
Chocolatey

It allows users to host and manage personal or enterprise-wide packages, applications, and components. It was originally designed as a private NuGet manager and symbol and source server.

It is based on a developer-centric package manager called NuGet. Unlike manual installations, It adds, updates, and uninstalls programs in the background requiring very little user interaction.

Share pre-built and pre-tested code; Scan and Validate Open-source Packages
works with all existing software installation technologies; works with runtime binaries and zip archives
Statistics
Stacks
17
Stacks
96
Followers
6
Followers
124
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Linux
Linux
NuGet
NuGet
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Ansible
Ansible
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to ProGet, Chocolatey?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Bun

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

Homebrew

Homebrew

Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana