Chat by Stream vs SendBird vs Sinch

Overview

Sinch

Stacks41

Followers117

Votes32

SendBird

Stacks142

Followers405

Votes78

Chat by Stream

Stacks18

Followers54

Votes95

Chat by Stream vs SendBird vs Sinch: What are the differences?

Technical Stack: Chat by Stream provides an extensive range of SDKs and a powerful API. On the other hand, SendBird offers features like comprehensive moderation tools and rich message threading. Sinch emphasizes on scalability and reliability, catering to large enterprises.
Cost Structure: Stream Chat has a flexible pricing model based on active users, while SendBird's pricing is based on monthly active users. Sinch offers pay-as-you-go pricing, allowing users to scale their chat applications without overpaying for unused resources.
Customization Options: Stream Chat offers high levels of customization with UI components, while SendBird provides a wide array of UI kits for faster development. Sinch focuses on providing customizable chat features for tailor-made user experiences.
Security Features: Chat by Stream has robust security measures in place, including end-to-end encryption and GDPR compliance. SendBird emphasizes on data security with features like message retention control and access management. Sinch ensures data protection through secure channels and compliance with industry standards.
Platform Integration: Stream Chat seamlessly integrates with various platforms and frameworks, making it easy to build chat applications across different environments. SendBird offers SDKs for multiple platforms and provides extensive documentation for integration. Sinch supports integration with popular platforms through APIs and plugins, enabling developers to add chat functionality to existing applications effortlessly.
Scalability and Performance: Stream Chat boasts high scalability and performance, supporting millions of concurrent users with low latency. SendBird also offers high scalability with a global cloud infrastructure for reliable performance. Sinch ensures high availability and minimal downtime through efficient load balancing and server management.

In Summary, Stream Chat, SendBird, and Sinch differ in terms of technical stack, cost structure, customization options, security features, platform integration, and scalability/performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sinch	SendBird	Chat by Stream
Sinch makes it easy for developers to add voice, messaging and SMS to their apps with just a few lines of code. Enrich your apps with communications that your users will love.	SendBird is a Messaging SDK, Chat API, and fully managed chat infrastructure for your mobile apps and websites. Embeddable chat for iOS, Android, JavaScript, Unity, .NET.	Chat API and SDK. With a beautiful UI Kit, easy to use React Components and powerful API. Add Chat to any application in a matter of hours. The tech uses Go, RocksDB and Raft. By the creators of Stream, the API that powers activity feeds for more than 300 million users.
iOS, Android and JavaScript SDK with support for REST;Voice calling and SMS at market leading prices;Enrich your apps with sticky features such as messaging and calling to increase user retention and engagement;Two-factor authentication and user verification for added security for your app and user base;24/7 in house monitoring to ensure your app has the best calling and messaging service possible;Simple at its core - with a few lines of code, any app can start calling and messaging across the world; Call over 220 countries - more than any other platform;Analytics and Reporting dashboard so you can review the performance of your calling and messaging apps;More Info? Email social@sinch.com	In-app chat experiences users will love; Immersive voice and video experiences; Easy in-app chat support for your customers; Enterprise-ready compliance	Reactions;Threads & Replies; Presence/who is online;Fulltext search on chat messages;Messages states; Typing Indicators;Message history;Powerful query support for channels and users;AI based moderation for spam and profanity;User Roles;@mentions;User invites;Mute users;Ban users;Flag Messages;Custom Messages;React Components;Push notifications;Webhooks;Unread message counts;Multi Region support;GDPR compliancy tools;HIPAA ready;Custom Slack Style Slash commands;Highly available infrastructure with Raft replication;Giphy integration;Url enrichment;Video Playback; CDN integrated;Fast response time; On premise;Fully customizable;Powerful CLI;Unlimited message retention;99.999% uptime SLA; 24/7 phone support; SAML login; 2FA for developer accounts;Emoticons;File uploads via select, drag and drop and clipboard; React Native Components;
Statistics
Stacks 41	Stacks 142	Stacks 18
Followers 117	Followers 405	Followers 54
Votes 32	Votes 78	Votes 95
Pros & Cons
Pros 9 Super smooth SDK 8 Easy setup 6 Cross-platform (iOS, Android, Web) 5 Super voice quality 4 Great support Cons 2 Crashed in ios when make connection in vedio calling	Pros 13 Active support is impressive. (Support for private deve 10 Easy to use 10 Pre-built UI for major platforms 8 Migration API for customers using other chat services 7 Scalability is awesome Cons 2 Policy on concurrent users leads to overages and overch 2 Prices ramp up exponentially	Pros 15 Reasonable Pricing 14 Threads 13 SDKs for React, RN, Android and iOS are better 13 Reactions 13 Very fast and scalable
Integrations
No integrations available	No integrations available	PHP React Native Python Ruby Swift React .NET Java

What are some alternatives to Sinch, SendBird, Chat by Stream?

ChannelizeIO

Add In-App User-to-User Communication into Mobile Apps & Websites, with rich & engaging Text Chat, Video, and Audio Calling experiences, to Increase User Engagement and Enable new Revenue Streams.

Agora

Agora.io provides building blocks for you to add real-time voice and video communications through a simple and powerful SDK. You can integrate the Agora SDK to enable real-time communications in your own application quickly.

OpenTok

It adds the clarity and emotion of face-to-face communication to your brand whether you're developing for the web, iOS, or Android. We make the integration of high-quality live video a breeze so that you can focus on building a great product.

QuickBlox

Add powerful communication features to your mobile app and data services for your backend<br>

Layer

Layer's asynchronous messaging fabric is capable of transporting payloads of any type. Get your users talking with chat, voice or video messaging. Pull them back in with push. Connect friends, colleagues or perfect strangers seamlessly.

Scringo

Scringo offers a unique Community & Messaging Platform that turns every app into an independent, dynamic & fully functional social network.

TalkJS

TalkJS provides a chat API & Javascript SDK with a pre-built UI that allows developers to add chat between users on websites and apps in hours instead of months.

PopcornNotify

Popcorn Notify is designed to be an effortless method for sending emails and text messages from your code. Client libraries are simple to install and are available on pip and npm.

inTouch

Multichannel messaging SaaS to manage SMS, Email and RCS from a single interface. Supports transactional and marketing messaging, automation workflows, OTP authentication and API-based integrations.

Enterprise SMS Gateway Software & CPaaS Platform

TeleOSS provides high-throughput SMS gateway software, SMPP/SIGTRAN support, and global messaging solutions.

Related Comparisons

Chat by Stream vs SendBird vs Sinch: What are the differences?

Technical Stack: Chat by Stream provides an extensive range of SDKs and a powerful API. On the other hand, SendBird offers features like comprehensive moderation tools and rich message threading. Sinch emphasizes on scalability and reliability, catering to large enterprises.
Cost Structure: Stream Chat has a flexible pricing model based on active users, while SendBird's pricing is based on monthly active users. Sinch offers pay-as-you-go pricing, allowing users to scale their chat applications without overpaying for unused resources.
Customization Options: Stream Chat offers high levels of customization with UI components, while SendBird provides a wide array of UI kits for faster development. Sinch focuses on providing customizable chat features for tailor-made user experiences.
Security Features: Chat by Stream has robust security measures in place, including end-to-end encryption and GDPR compliance. SendBird emphasizes on data security with features like message retention control and access management. Sinch ensures data protection through secure channels and compliance with industry standards.
Platform Integration: Stream Chat seamlessly integrates with various platforms and frameworks, making it easy to build chat applications across different environments. SendBird offers SDKs for multiple platforms and provides extensive documentation for integration. Sinch supports integration with popular platforms through APIs and plugins, enabling developers to add chat functionality to existing applications effortlessly.
Scalability and Performance: Stream Chat boasts high scalability and performance, supporting millions of concurrent users with low latency. SendBird also offers high scalability with a global cloud infrastructure for reliable performance. Sinch ensures high availability and minimal downtime through efficient load balancing and server management.

In Summary, Stream Chat, SendBird, and Sinch differ in terms of technical stack, cost structure, customization options, security features, platform integration, and scalability/performance.

Chat by Stream vs SendBird vs Sinch

Overview