Charles vs Insomnia REST Client

Overview

Charles

Stacks140

Followers167

Votes0

Insomnia REST Client

Stacks800

Followers652

Votes44

Charles vs Insomnia REST Client: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Charles and Insomnia REST Client

User Interface: Charles has a traditional desktop application interface with a menu bar, toolbar, and multiple windows, providing a comprehensive view of network activity. On the other hand, Insomnia REST Client has a sleek and modern user interface that focuses solely on the request/response workflow, resulting in a simpler and more intuitive user experience.
Platform Compatibility: Charles is available for macOS, Windows, and Linux operating systems, allowing it to cater to a wider range of users. In contrast, Insomnia REST Client is primarily designed for macOS, with limited support for Windows and Linux, which may limit its accessibility for some users.
Proxy and Recording Capabilities: One of Charles' key strengths is its powerful proxy and recording capabilities. It can act as a proxy server to intercept and record network traffic, making it ideal for debugging and analyzing web applications. Insomnia REST Client, on the other hand, lacks built-in proxy and recording functionality, focusing more on the development and testing of REST APIs.
Plugins and Extensions: Charles supports a wide range of plugins and extensions, allowing users to extend its functionality and integrate it with other tools and services. Insomnia REST Client, while lacking the extensive plugin ecosystem of Charles, does offer a selection of built-in plugins and extensions, such as OAuth support and code generation.
Collaboration and Sharing: Insomnia REST Client offers seamless collaboration and sharing features, allowing users to synchronize their workspaces and share API specifications with teammates. This makes it easier for teams to work together and maintain consistency in their API development process. Charles, on the other hand, lacks these collaboration and sharing features, making it less suited for team-based projects.
Pricing Model: Charles follows a one-time purchase model, where users pay a fixed price to obtain a perpetual license for the software. On the contrary, Insomnia REST Client offers a freemium pricing model, with a free version that provides most essential features and a paid Pro version with additional advanced features and support options.

In Summary, Charles and Insomnia REST Client differ in their user interface, platform compatibility, proxy and recording capabilities, plugin support, collaboration features, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Charles, Insomnia REST Client

Stephen

Artificial Intelligence Fellow

Feb 4, 2020

Decided

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

361k views361k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Charles	Insomnia REST Client
Charles is a web proxy (HTTP Proxy / HTTP Monitor) that runs on your own computer. Your web browser (or any other Internet application) is then configured to access the Internet through Charles, and Charles is then able to record and display for you all of the data that is sent and received.	Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.
SSL Proxying – view SSL requests and responses in plain text;Bandwidth Throttling to simulate slower Internet connections including latency;AJAX debugging – view XML and JSON requests and responses as a tree or as text;AMF – view the contents of Flash Remoting / Flex Remoting messages as a tree;Repeat requests to test back-end changes;Edit requests to test different inputs;Breakpoints to intercept and edit requests or responses;Validate recorded HTML, CSS and RSS/atom responses using the W3C validator	Mac, Windows and Linux;Data import/export;SSL client certificates;Response history;JSONPath and XPath;Preview rendered HTML;Multipart form;Query parameter editor;Configurable proxy;Cloud sync and sharing;Nunjucks templating;Filter requests;Toggle SSL validation;Keyboard shortcuts;Configurable timeout;HAR import;Usable at almost all sizes;Drag-n-drop organization;Responsive interface;Import from curl;
Statistics
Stacks 140	Stacks 800
Followers 167	Followers 652
Votes 0	Votes 44
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 16 Easy to work with 11 Great user interface 6 Works with GraphQL 4 Cross platform, available for Mac, Windows, and Linux 3 Opensource Cons 4 Do not have team sharing options 2 Do not store credentials in HTTP

What are some alternatives to Charles, Insomnia REST Client?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

DuckRails

DuckRails is an open source development tool that helps developer mock API endpoints quickly & dynamically outside the application code.

Related Comparisons

Charles vs Insomnia REST Client: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Charles and Insomnia REST Client

User Interface: Charles has a traditional desktop application interface with a menu bar, toolbar, and multiple windows, providing a comprehensive view of network activity. On the other hand, Insomnia REST Client has a sleek and modern user interface that focuses solely on the request/response workflow, resulting in a simpler and more intuitive user experience.
Platform Compatibility: Charles is available for macOS, Windows, and Linux operating systems, allowing it to cater to a wider range of users. In contrast, Insomnia REST Client is primarily designed for macOS, with limited support for Windows and Linux, which may limit its accessibility for some users.
Proxy and Recording Capabilities: One of Charles' key strengths is its powerful proxy and recording capabilities. It can act as a proxy server to intercept and record network traffic, making it ideal for debugging and analyzing web applications. Insomnia REST Client, on the other hand, lacks built-in proxy and recording functionality, focusing more on the development and testing of REST APIs.
Plugins and Extensions: Charles supports a wide range of plugins and extensions, allowing users to extend its functionality and integrate it with other tools and services. Insomnia REST Client, while lacking the extensive plugin ecosystem of Charles, does offer a selection of built-in plugins and extensions, such as OAuth support and code generation.
Collaboration and Sharing: Insomnia REST Client offers seamless collaboration and sharing features, allowing users to synchronize their workspaces and share API specifications with teammates. This makes it easier for teams to work together and maintain consistency in their API development process. Charles, on the other hand, lacks these collaboration and sharing features, making it less suited for team-based projects.
Pricing Model: Charles follows a one-time purchase model, where users pay a fixed price to obtain a perpetual license for the software. On the contrary, Insomnia REST Client offers a freemium pricing model, with a free version that provides most essential features and a paid Pro version with additional advanced features and support options.

In Summary, Charles and Insomnia REST Client differ in their user interface, platform compatibility, proxy and recording capabilities, plugin support, collaboration features, and pricing models.

Charles vs Insomnia REST Client

Overview

Charles vs Insomnia REST Client: What are the differences?