Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Charles vs Insomnia REST Client: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Charles and Insomnia REST Client
User Interface: Charles has a traditional desktop application interface with a menu bar, toolbar, and multiple windows, providing a comprehensive view of network activity. On the other hand, Insomnia REST Client has a sleek and modern user interface that focuses solely on the request/response workflow, resulting in a simpler and more intuitive user experience.
Platform Compatibility: Charles is available for macOS, Windows, and Linux operating systems, allowing it to cater to a wider range of users. In contrast, Insomnia REST Client is primarily designed for macOS, with limited support for Windows and Linux, which may limit its accessibility for some users.
Proxy and Recording Capabilities: One of Charles' key strengths is its powerful proxy and recording capabilities. It can act as a proxy server to intercept and record network traffic, making it ideal for debugging and analyzing web applications. Insomnia REST Client, on the other hand, lacks built-in proxy and recording functionality, focusing more on the development and testing of REST APIs.
Plugins and Extensions: Charles supports a wide range of plugins and extensions, allowing users to extend its functionality and integrate it with other tools and services. Insomnia REST Client, while lacking the extensive plugin ecosystem of Charles, does offer a selection of built-in plugins and extensions, such as OAuth support and code generation.
Collaboration and Sharing: Insomnia REST Client offers seamless collaboration and sharing features, allowing users to synchronize their workspaces and share API specifications with teammates. This makes it easier for teams to work together and maintain consistency in their API development process. Charles, on the other hand, lacks these collaboration and sharing features, making it less suited for team-based projects.
Pricing Model: Charles follows a one-time purchase model, where users pay a fixed price to obtain a perpetual license for the software. On the contrary, Insomnia REST Client offers a freemium pricing model, with a free version that provides most essential features and a paid Pro version with additional advanced features and support options.
In Summary, Charles and Insomnia REST Client differ in their user interface, platform compatibility, proxy and recording capabilities, plugin support, collaboration features, and pricing models.
Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.
Pros of Charles
Pros of Insomnia REST Client
- Easy to work with16
- Great user interface11
- Works with GraphQL6
- Cross platform, available for Mac, Windows, and Linux4
- Opensource3
- Vim and Emacs key map2
- Preserves request templates2
- Does not have history feature0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Charles
Cons of Insomnia REST Client
- Do not have team sharing options4
- Do not store credentials in HTTP2