Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Chainer

17
23
+ 1
0
PyTorch

1.5K
1.5K
+ 1
43
Add tool

Chainer vs PyTorch: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Chainer and PyTorch

Chainer and PyTorch are both popular deep learning frameworks with their own unique features and capabilities. Here are the key differences between Chainer and PyTorch:

  1. Dynamic vs Static Computational Graph: One of the significant differences between Chainer and PyTorch is their approach to computational graphs. Chainer uses a dynamic computational graph, allowing for flexible and on-the-fly changes to the graph structure during runtime. On the other hand, PyTorch uses a static computational graph, which requires the graph to be defined and fixed before running the model. This dynamic vs. static difference has implications for ease of use and debugging, as well as performance optimization.

  2. Automatic Differentiation: Both Chainer and PyTorch provide automatic differentiation, but they differ in their implementation. Chainer uses a define-by-run approach, where the computational graph is constructed dynamically, and gradients are calculated on-the-fly using backpropagation. PyTorch, on the other hand, uses a define-and-run approach, where the graph is defined beforehand, and gradients are calculated by tracking operations on tensors during forward pass and then automatically computing the gradients during the backward pass.

  3. GPU Support: Chainer and PyTorch both support GPU acceleration for deep learning tasks. However, the methods of utilizing GPUs differ slightly between the two frameworks. Chainer uses a "Device" abstraction to manage data storage on different devices, while PyTorch uses CUDA tensors and associated functions to explicitly specify GPU usage.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Chainer and PyTorch have different sizes and characteristics of their communities and ecosystems. PyTorch has a larger user community and a more extensive library of pre-trained models, making it easier to find resources and collaborate with others. Chainer, although smaller in terms of user base, has a dedicated community and provides a set of well-documented and tested models.

  5. Model Deployment: When it comes to deploying models in production, PyTorch offers better support and diverse options. PyTorch provides TorchScript, which allows models to be exported into a serialized format and executed independently from the original framework. Additionally, PyTorch has seamless integration with popular production frameworks like TensorFlow Serving, ONNX, and TorchServe. Chainer, while capable of exporting models, may require some additional effort for deployment.

  6. Pythonic Interface: Chainer and PyTorch differ in their underlying interface and the degree of alignment with Python syntax. Chainer provides more Pythonic syntax with dynamic computational graphs, making it easier to learn and understand. PyTorch, being more declarative and having a static computational graph, may require a better understanding of the underlying concepts for certain operations.

In summary, the key differences between Chainer and PyTorch lie in their approach to computational graph construction, automatic differentiation strategies, GPU support, community size and ecosystem, model deployment options, and interface alignment with Python.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Chainer
Pros of PyTorch
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 15
      Easy to use
    • 11
      Developer Friendly
    • 10
      Easy to debug
    • 7
      Sometimes faster than TensorFlow

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Chainer
    Cons of PyTorch
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 3
        Lots of code
      • 1
        It eats poop

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Chainer?

      It is an open source deep learning framework written purely in Python on top of Numpy and CuPy Python libraries aiming at flexibility. It supports CUDA computation. It only requires a few lines of code to leverage a GPU. It also runs on multiple GPUs with little effort.

      What is PyTorch?

      PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Chainer?
      What companies use PyTorch?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Chainer or PyTorch.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Chainer?
      What tools integrate with PyTorch?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      PythonDockerKubernetes+14
      12
      2597
      Dec 4 2019 at 8:01PM

      Pinterest

      KubernetesJenkinsTensorFlow+4
      5
      3267
      What are some alternatives to Chainer and PyTorch?
      Keras
      Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/
      TensorFlow
      TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.
      Theano
      Theano is a Python library that lets you to define, optimize, and evaluate mathematical expressions, especially ones with multi-dimensional arrays (numpy.ndarray).
      Torch
      It is easy to use and efficient, thanks to an easy and fast scripting language, LuaJIT, and an underlying C/CUDA implementation.
      Caffe
      It is a deep learning framework made with expression, speed, and modularity in mind.
      See all alternatives